I find Macs to be too limiting in the compatible software available. They are overpriced. PCs are more versitile and can handle anything a Mac can only cheaper. JMO and MPE over the past 20 years. I used both Macs and PCs at work.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
P.S. If you DO go with a Windows machine, pay extra and get XP. Vista is a nightmare.
Just a note, I don't think XP is an extra charge.
Eww a Gateway running Vista, I will definitely pass![Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Interesting for the OP.
From an (obviously) impartial site.
Please note that the PC is more expensive than the Mac on that test![]()
Either one will do the job fine, but you'll get a LOT more bang for your buck with a PC. You can even *gasp* upgrade them!
Translation:The PC is a paperweight.If you're serious about creative work in ANY capacity, get a Mac.
In general choice between Mac and PC is how much time do you want to spend working on the computer, or doing work with the computer.
PC's you have lots of options for parts, companies, vendors and so on. That means its up to you deal with driver issues and incompatibilities that arise. So you will be spending time working on you computer and not doing work. That is true whether you use Windows or Linux.
Mac you have fewer choices because only one source Apple. Your options are mainly how much RAM or hard drive and couple others. Being that means things just tend to work because there aren't a zillion combinations of parts and vendors. So you get the computer set it up and get to using the computer. That luxury has a price Mac's are more expensive. But Mac's also hold there resell value better down the road.
So its all about cost and how much of your time you are willing to spend tweaking the computer instead doing work.

Eww a Gateway running Vista, I will definitely pass!
Seriously, I'm not sure what so-called authoritative sources are doing when they run these kinds of comparisons. Why don't they use a serious PC (read NOT A GATEWAY...), running XP?
It really comes down to personal preference. I personally don't care for most Apple products, but I won't say they suck. Either will do what you need.
Do yourself a favor, head down to Best Buy (or better yet an Apple Store if there is one nearby) and check them out. (Yeah, you can't check a PC out at the Apple store, but you can at Best Buy)
And if price is a consideration, be aware that you'll probably spend more for the Mac.
A good question that anyone needs to answer before making a decision, but any decent PC or Mac DAW can do that. Everyone seems to want to imply that one platform is for Pros and one platform is for Amateurs, but it's just different software.And, really, what are your needs? If you do a lot of electronic music, or 50 tracks of audio with plug-ins your needs are going to be different than a person who just wants to record practices or demos.
+ 1,000The OP mostly wants to know what would be best for his needs. Based on his description, his needs are pretty simple, meaning either platform has apps to get the job done.
However, it sounds also like he's a relative newbie to computer recording/electronic music. I'm a faculty member at a school of music (computer music dept) and for ease of use and transparency to the novice, I'd definitely go with a mac. Don't bother reinventing the wheel when it's already been done for you. Start w/Garageband, which is really unbeatable for essentially being free. If you get really into it, go w/Logic Express. IMO...