I have tried all of their stuff before 2 series. Unhappy of what I have got. I am a maniac. But it was soapy and unnatural sound. Worse than Zoom 505.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
This thread is misguided. The MarkBass synth and SourceAudio BEF do completely different things.
Whether sourceaudio can make quality sounds without the hothand is a matter of preference. They're not junk in my eyes, rather the most flexible and affordable high end pedals on the market.
So im just trying to grasp how you think these pedals are in two completely different universes... how do you not see the similarity in sound between an amazing envelope and a bass synth??? like what are you talking about lol.
Yeah that makes total sense but what im saying is that filters and synths go hand in hand. I guess its personal preference but most people that rock bass synths also have filters and vice versa. they are not in a different realm, these two pedals are in many peoples set ups, like they have both. not only that but during an actual song it would not be unorthadox to play a synth instead of a filter. I am just asking people what they think from first hand experience with the pedals. I am sorry you feel that its a pointless thread thats not my problem lol
Yeah I dont see the similarity.. overdrive and compression?? thats apples to oranges my friend these 2 effects are much much more similar and are used in the same styles of music therefore I just wanted to know which was more high quality.. I am going to GC to try both of them out in a few days So ill see which one I want then.
Compression can be used in everything where as a filter and synth most likely are not. and overdrive? how does overdrive compare to compression at all?
Okay, I don't own the BEF Pro, but I used to own the Markbass SuperSynth and I currently own the Source Audio Manta, so I suppose I am in a decent position to comment on the OP's question. But the two just don't produce the same sounds, to me it is apples and oranges.
I feel you on the whole fundamentally different thing I just dont see how you would think its weird that these are the two pedals im contemplating and I think im going to take more time and put as much info into the post as I can at first.
Both effects have filters whose sensitivity can be dialed in to respond effectively to your instrument's attack. How fast they respond is also a changeable parameter, allowing the movement to be faster or slower.I am looking into both and wondering which has more attack and response. what do yall think? I have never played either.
I've been unsure about asking for clarification from the OP, because RaunchMister's original question didn't sound like it was really directed at the filter aspects which the pedals might have in common. It sounded like more a question one would ask about a fuzz or an overdrive.
With that said, let me try an answer:
Hey, So I did look at videos on utube before posting, probably about 2 hours worth. So that said I found in the videos that the markbass synth had super sick sounds but that it lacked the EQ of the SA filter, it seemed to me the response was better with the SA pedal and thats what im looking for is a really super solid pedal. I think its the SA thanks for the input! I didnt know the markbass could do that.