I would have thought you were crazy.
And you would have been correct.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I would have thought you were crazy.

Absolutely nothing wrong with GK, and I'm sure you made the right choice for you. However, it seems that those who describe Markbass amps as "muddy" have misused the VLE/VPF filters at the end of the EQ chain. These should be turned completely anti-clockwise (counter-clockwise to the Americans) to disengage them, with the other EQ dials set to noon for the "neutral" tone. With everything "nooned", you'll get a big mid-scoop, some bass boost and a treble roll-off that will sound muddy indeed. A Behringer might sound better.
Give me 4 amps I must try before I buy. All compos, all under $900, For classic to progressive rock.
I own a MarkBass Berlin 115 and the NY 115 cab,,, truly a rig of doom,,,, anyhow I was wanting a smaller combo for small gigs and rehearsal so I purchased the GK MB115, took it to my fiirst small gig a few night's later,,,,,, after the gig (the next day) I returned the GK MB115 and purchased the MarkBass 112 combo.
I will be playing the same small gig next week, this time with the MarkBass 112, and will be able to compare.
But in reality Im pretty certain the MarkBass 112 is going to blow away the GK MB115 (in that same small room).
Im not knockin GK at all, I love their products and they are great company.
Yep, the MarkBass 112 combo is 3 times the cost of the GK MB115, but in the end, I think the extra cost is going to be more than justified.
Cheers
Davyo