• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Mccartney's sound

i really like mccartney's sound on "with a little help from my friends". i know he plays a rickenbacker on that song, but i've been told that it's not the typical rick sound, so what bass would you use to get that sound, had you not known it was recorded on a rick?
(i've asked a similliar question before, but i feel that i was too vague and didn't get a satisfying answer, so i'm asking again)
 
This is the formula as I've come to understand it:

Flatwound strings (they don't make the ones he used back then; he uses La Bella's now)... high action on the Rick (as high as you can get away with)... the right EQ on a tube amp (lots of mids & not too much treble)... and a pick.

Voila! McCartney tone (or at least close to it)!

Now... as far as McCartney technique... well... you're on your own there!
 
McCartney recorded sound on early Beatle records has a lot to do with generation loss. Sgt Pepper's I've heard was done on first 8-track machine, two 4-tracks sync'd up, or a single 4-track. What this means is a lot of ping-ponging tracks around to put all the instruments and vocals on. Each time you bounce a track you lose a little of edge off the sound. The drums and bass were usually put on first and recorded hot knowing they would be bounced a lot. So McCartney recorded sound early had a lot to do with the recording technogy of the time. Like the secret "black box" they had back then that eventually because known as Dolby noise reduction. Listening to Beatles records from beginning to ends is a history in recording technology.
 
ok, this really is different from what i had in mind... some questions:
1. lots of mid? it sounded to me that he turned the mids down low on that song...
2. suppose i don't have a rick, what the best setup for it (neck\bridge pickup etc...)?
thanks :)
 
I get it now No_Germs...

...you want the tone on THAT PARTICULAR song...

OK

Same formula as I gave you earlier... but to that, add picking close to the end of the fingerboard as the 'missing ingredient'. This actually should approximate the sound you're looking for on most any passive bass.

At least it does for me!:smug:
 
steveb98 said:
McCartney recorded sound on early Beatle records has a lot to do with generation loss. Sgt Pepper's I've heard was done on first 8-track machine, two 4-tracks sync'd up, or a single 4-track. What this means is a lot of ping-ponging tracks around to put all the instruments and vocals on. Each time you bounce a track you lose a little of edge off the sound. The drums and bass were usually put on first and recorded hot knowing they would be bounced a lot. So McCartney recorded sound early had a lot to do with the recording technogy of the time. Like the secret "black box" they had back then that eventually because known as Dolby noise reduction. Listening to Beatles records from beginning to ends is a history in recording technology.

Except that by the recording of SP he was recording the bass last, after everything else was recorded, and on it's own track.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChrisWright
What many modern bassists fail to recognize is how essential those flatwound strings were to McCartney's tone.

Also, McCartney's fingers and brain would count quite a bit, but you gotta start with the flats.

Who was talking about turning the treble up? What? Treble is for guitarists.