• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Medium or Short Scale?

I'm on the fence as to whether I should go for a Squier Mustang bass or the Squier Jaguar bass and it all comes down to the scale length. Since I've only ever owned a long scale bass I'm not exactly sure which one would make the most since. I've heard great tihngs about both of these basses but have only ever played a Mustang. Due to the current situation getting to try a Jaguar right now is next to impossible at the moment. So, what say you the collective spirit of TB? Mustang or Jag? Please say why, if you don't mind. Thanks & Cheers!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ricky Rioli
I own a Mustang P/J, a modded Bronco and a Sandberg Lionel and love the short scale. I have left my 34" scale basses in their cases, neglected. Haven`t tried a medium scale but what I would say is the Squier Mustang seems to vary a bit in quality so defo a try before you buy if possible.

I had a white one and it was ok but the tuners were made of cheese! But after changing them and the rubbish strings, it was a decent player and set me on my 30" scale trip. They are just so easy to play and when I pick up my P bass after the shorties, it just feels cumbersome.
 
Moving to a 32" medium scale was hardly noticeable for me, but going from 34 to 30 was quite a jump. The issue was not so much the scale length, but the relative feel of the strings, and need to adjust playing style a little to accommodate the differences. Both of those basses are pretty iconic, and I prefer the longer scale to the 30", but to me the ergonomics of the Mustang feel better than the Jaguar, so in the end, I'd personally go Mustang, but YMMV.
 
I've played both long and short scale basses for about 50 years until a few years ago when I switched over to short scale. I tried a couple of medium scale basses and found I prefer the short scale.

My short scale stable includes the Fender Mustang PJ and Squier Jaguar VM shortscale. The Jag has my favorite neck profile but the profile of the PJ is nice and not a hindrance.

Before I bought the PJ I bought the newest Squier Mustang and it was fine but was bit lower output and I preferred the top load bridge of the PJ so I returned the Squier and bought my PJ very lightly used at the same shop for just a bit more than what I paid for the Squier.
 
Short scale is easily gotten used to. Medium scale, should you want to upgrade or try something else, your choices will be very limited.

Also, I owned a MIM Mustang (still have my MIA), and I've jammed with a Jaguar. The Mustang is IMO a much better sounding and feeling bass.
 
I'm on the fence as to whether I should go for a Squier Mustang bass or the Squier Jaguar bass and it all comes down to the scale length. Since I've only ever owned a long scale bass I'm not exactly sure which one would make the most since. I've heard great tihngs about both of these basses but have only ever played a Mustang. Due to the current situation getting to try a Jaguar right now is next to impossible at the moment. So, what say you the collective spirit of TB? Mustang or Jag? Please say why, if you don't mind. Thanks & Cheers!
Well, let's start with the question of why you want one of these two particular basses, as opposed to whatever long-scale basses you have (or have had) and the zillion other possible options available. Is it just because you want a shorter scale-length (and if so why?) or is it for some other reason?
 
I'm on the fence as to whether I should go for a Squier Mustang bass or the Squier Jaguar bass and it all comes down to the scale length. Since I've only ever owned a long scale bass I'm not exactly sure which one would make the most since. I've heard great tihngs about both of these basses but have only ever played a Mustang. Due to the current situation getting to try a Jaguar right now is next to impossible at the moment. So, what say you the collective spirit of TB? Mustang or Jag? Please say why, if you don't mind. Thanks & Cheers!

I'd argue that there's a couple of other factors that would make more of a difference to the feel of the instrument overall than those 2" of scale length.

The Mustang is a slab body, so no belly cut or arm contour. The Jag has both. I have a Mustang PJ and I love the instrument itself, but it gets less play than my shortie 'Ray - and its essentially for that reason. Once I've been playing and I'm used to it, it's not too bad, but it does bother me at first.

The second thing is body size. The Mustang is much, much more compact than the Jaguar, and that size different will be noticeable. All things being equal, it should make the Jag heavier - however, a common complaint is that 'Stangs can be a little neck heavy without lightweight tuners, so that's definitely something to take into account.

Past the ergonomics, I'd also consider sound - a single Mustang pickup will sound very different to a PJ setup. If you want the bridge pickup tone, it has to be the Jag. If you like a P tone, the Jaguar will do that perfectly, but the Mustang will get you close, with a cool vintage vibe as well. You can replace both easily, but a great Mustang pickup like a Nordy wouldn't be cheap, and hard to find second hand compared to a PJ set.

I'd also consider strings. If you have a preferred set or model, look up what they're available in - short scale seems to be more common than medium, so you'll have more choice. If you go for the Mustang, you might want to go for a slightly heavier guage to keep the same tension level, so take that into account while you look.

As a tl;dr summary - while the different in scale length is definitely noticeable, I don't think it's enough to make the decision between the basses simple. They'll vary greatly in sound and feel as well as replacement part & string options, and my advice would be to get the instrument you think will be best for you in the long run. You can easily adapt to short or medium scale, but it isn't so easy to adapt to a slab body or a bigger body or not having a bridge pickup if you need one.. and so on.
 
I just returned a new MIM mustang pj. Didn't like it. Buzzy J pickup, very heavy, lots of neck dive.

have a wattplower. 30". Very comfortable. Plays great. Have a very light Squier Mustang on the way with ultralight tuners. We'll see how that works out. I like 30" Basses.
 
I'm on the fence as to whether I should go for a Squier Mustang bass or the Squier Jaguar bass and it all comes down to the scale length. Since I've only ever owned a long scale bass I'm not exactly sure which one would make the most since. I've heard great tihngs about both of these basses but have only ever played a Mustang. Due to the current situation getting to try a Jaguar right now is next to impossible at the moment. So, what say you the collective spirit of TB? Mustang or Jag? Please say why, if you don't mind. Thanks & Cheers!
Unless I'm mistaken, the selection of medium scale strings is more limited than short scale..
 
Both really cool basses. Do not sweat the scale length. I've been playing for around 40 years and just picked up my first short this year and I routinely go between it and my 34s, even fretless. Your body knows more than you think, it's really no challenge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmt
Moving to a 32" medium scale was hardly noticeable for me, but going from 34 to 30 was quite a jump. The issue was not so much the scale length, but the relative feel of the strings, and need to adjust playing style a little to accommodate the differences. Both of those basses are pretty iconic, and I prefer the longer scale to the 30", but to me the ergonomics of the Mustang feel better than the Jaguar, so in the end, I'd personally go Mustang, but YMMV.

I've found the same- the tension change in short scales is a whole different thing to get used to. My main bass for the past couple years has been a 33" scale and it's been a nice balance of playability while still maintaining most of the tension that I prefer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej
I've found the same- the tension change in short scales is a whole different thing to get used to. My main bass for the past couple years has been a 33" scale and it's been a nice balance of playability while still maintaining most of the tension that I prefer.

100% agree. My main player is 33" and it's super easy to play but feels like a full scale. I also have a 32" Fenderbird which makes that style playable for a small-stature person such as myself. I had an Ibanez Mikro that felt like a toy. Medium scale feels legit.