• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Mesa Subway cab paralysis - Which speaker size?

For recording it's the 112 for me, but I think the 115 would also work pretty well. For anything rock, I'd be EQing the 115 to get to get it to sound like the 112 -- it's a difference, but not night and day.

I don't have the Mesa 212 or 210, but for recording purposes I'd usually rather have a single speaker cab to eliminate any possibility of phase interference and comb filtering from other speakers.
 
I loved my 15's, but even without using the horn they were quite bright! One of the things that makes them awesome- the off axis clarity- but close mic'd I would have to do quite a bit of calming eq on the top end (easily done, but another model might be better suited for that?) I wonder if the other models are the same with the top end? Have played them but not in a studio/ mic'd situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
I'm looking at the Mesa Subway cabs (1x15/1x12/2x10) trying to decide which one to get. Looking to get punchy bass tones within dense mixes - meaning the bass needs to sit nicely in the mix, it can't dominate it. I'll be using it with various amp heads (mostly tube). This will be for recording only, and I'm trying to keep the rig fairly compact.

I was leaning towards the 1x15 but then started thinking that the 2x10 might be punchier.

Any suggestions?
Two things, if all you are going to do is record with it any of them will work. I’ve done sessions with just about any speaker configuration you can get, even guitar cabs, but none of the Mesa cabs you mention. I would also recommend adding a separate pre-effects direct send to the board as you are recording what is coming out of your cab. Personally, I prefer just a direct send to the board for most of my work, but I do understand that one can get some cool sounds out of a mic’d cab.

Just keep in mind, there is a lot of magic that happens at the control board tone wise. Today, with all the digital samples out there you can make your bass sound like a flute if you wanted to, so I’m pretty sure you can get a track down you’re happy with.

Finally, have a great session.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
For recording only? If for that ( which is a little odd these days ), but especially for your own practice pleasure ( and with tube amps, as stated ), I vote for the 15. I am NOT a metal player, fyi, and for funk/jazz/etc. the 15 that I have ( not Mesa, sorry Andy! ) serves me well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
View attachment 7257393

112, 115, and 410 owner here. Wish I had 2 210’s. I’d sell the rest. 115 gets the most use and it’s an absolute monster of a cab. 410 is utterly ridonkulous on its own and by far my favorite voiced out of the 3. The 112 is an easy schlep and has a surprising amount of low end when used with common sense.
Please report back in the tone comparing a 2x210 to a 410 for science. Inquiring minds want to know.
 
If you need control in dense metal mixes why are you putting a mic on a cab in the first place? And why are people discussing running dual cabs or the 2x12? I'm as much a fan of mic'ing bass amps as anyone but this is a situation where DI is going to win out 100% of the time IMO. Just do everything in the box so you can run parallel bass tracks, that way you have a grind track for the wall of sound and a clean track for low end clarity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -Stingray
Please report back in the tone comparing a 2x210 to a 410 for science. Inquiring minds want to know.
Doubt it’s in the cards for the foreseeable future. What I have and use is plenty. From what I’ve read on here and talking with @agedhorse, the 210 is nearly identical to the 410 just, less.

The couple times I’ve used all 3 cabs stacked like this for outside gigs has been nothing short of incredible. Unfathomable low end and more than enough power to take the entire audiences heads off with a gigantic daedric battle axe (Skyrim reference). Unfortunately, the 210 will not fit in the trunk of either of my cars. It’s a pain to take out my kids car seats lol.

The 115 is really a stellar cab and has served me and my wife’s bands very well and I’m happy with everything we own and use… but I know that 2x210’s would really facilitate what I want out of the 410/115/112 stack.

Now if Andy could design a custom “vertical” 410 just for me, WITHOUT charging me an arm and a leg…
 
Da kine 🤙🏽

31192.jpeg


Have had a chance to play, the SW 112, my 115, and a 2x10 once. My choice for me is the 115 I got originally before trying anything. It’s not because I have it and want to justify my choice ☺️

I liked the 12 very much but the 15 as a single cab daily driver was a better choice, for me. The 2x10 is very nice but there is still a thing that I hear in 2x10s that I don’t care for, not as much as other makes but, still there for me.

I would probably enjoy the 2x12s and 2x15s very much. The 4x10 is crazy too much but would be enjoyed. If someone gave me one I would suffer with it. 🤣
 
Last edited:
I'm looking at the Mesa Subway cabs (1x15/1x12/2x10) trying to decide which one to get. Looking to get punchy bass tones within dense mixes - meaning the bass needs to sit nicely in the mix, it can't dominate it. I'll be using it with various amp heads (mostly tube). This will be for recording only, and I'm trying to keep the rig fairly compact.

I was leaning towards the 1x15 but then started thinking that the 2x10 might be punchier.

Any suggestions?
I recorded this some time ago trialing 115 and 210. Mic'd the cabs and did a "room" mic with an iphone, since mic placement varies the tone so much on a cab, I think the iPhone mic is maybe a more accurate representation.







 
  • Like
Reactions: Meriphew