I hope the knobs don't get too small... good sized solid knobs are important on a dark stage.....
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
1 speakon is cool, but pleeeease keep the XLR out![]()
Agreed, that's why that prototype used our standard knobs and standard compact spacing. I am VERY aware of making an amp too small to be practical.The 800w models are light enough and small enough. I have no interest in a miniature head that is so small that I can't turn one knob without budging adjacent ones. Reduction in size beyond a certain point can be counter productive. Let's keep it ergonomic! Make the knobs sturdy and function labels large enough to be easily seen in low light. The knobs could be color coded. Knob diameter needs to be large enough to allow easy fine tuning adjustments. Pots should be sturdy, with a shaft that doesn't flex, feels smooth when turning and with some turning resistance. The metal work should be heavy gage - your hand should not be able to depress the top or bottom panels.
They come in come in various sizes.I hope the knobs don't get too small... good sized solid knobs are important on a dark stage.....
Agreed, that's why that prototype used our standard knobs and standard compact spacing. I am VERY aware of making an amp too small to be practical.
Sorry sir I must have misspoke. I would prefer not to see small knobs on the D-350.They come in come in various sizes.
I assumed that you were, but, after reading some of the comments, I wanted to voice support for a sturdy, durable and ergonomic build. There are already plenty of light weight, miniature heads on the market. While it may soon be possible to make an 800w head the size of a smart phone, a sturdy 3x10x8 inch (or somewhat larger), 5-10 pound head with functional and attractive knobs and switched will always win out in my book.
I agree on this point. That is why I quickly returned the Contax T that I bought when it first came to market.Reduction in size beyond a certain point can be counter productive
A combo would be very cool, @Jeff Scott . I would go for a 2x8. And if possible, a 2x8 extension cab. Ohhh the possibilities!I have not read through past the first page, yet, but I agree an small combo amp with this chassis would be fantastic for smaller, on the go gigs, or for a recording/rehearsal amp. Say, a 1-10, or 2-8 vertical would be perfect.
Then, because it affects the width only, which features would you eliminate from the front to reduce the width say 1"?
Then, because it affects the width only, which features would yo eliminate from the front to reduce the width say 1"?
My experience with push-pull switching pots has been terrible on every product I have seen with them. Both operationally (we used to use them at Mesa and stopped because of customer complaints), and because the thinner shafts break much more easily.As an owner of Mark-series guitar heads this is a no brainer! Lose the swithces and use pull-pots.
From the D-800:
Input - Pull active
Bass - Pull deep
Master - Pull mute