• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Mike Pope Design MPP-1 Review

Bassbwithu

Supporting Member
Mar 18, 2004
1,057
157
45
Dallas, TX
I recently acquired a new Mike Pope Design MPP-1 Bass Preamp. You can find the details at www.michaelpopedesign.com. I'll start by saying that I'm a tone purist. I've always achieved my best tone in the studio going straight to the board, and I try to replicate this tone on stage. I've always had a difficult time getting the dynamics of my playing to come through on live gigs. Touch and articulation tend to get muddled once the frequencies on stage start to bleed and certain frequencies start resonating more than others. This is why I approached Mike about his preamps.
I have the MPP-1 single channel bass preamp running through the effects receive of a stereo walter woods. This powers (2) Markbass 121H cabinets, and for bigger stages I add the Markbass 151P and run Walter in stereo.
This preamp is impressive. A bit complicated, but nothing you can't get a hold of fairly quickly. There are basically 2 frequency points for each band. Similar to how guitar players think of their tone, Mike doesn't use numbers and instead uses Crunch and Air for treble, Round and Punch for the Mids, and Thick and Deep for the Bass.
The treble frequency is usable, unlike any I've ever heard. Boosting the Air frequency, you can achieve a more "open" sound which never sounds harsh, even when you boost it all the way. Crunch centers the frequency a little lower and dips more into the high mids, and can add a lot of pitch definition. Cutting the air acts a bit like a passive tone control which can help cut string noise. It also helps in getting a dark and funky finger tone.
The mid frequency does just what it says. Boosting punch helps achieve a really barky and cutting tone, cutting that frequency can get the "honk" out of your sound. Boosting round is what Mike calls the "mwah" maker. It boosts the low mids, and its frequency point is perfect for fattening up your bridge fingerstyle tone. Perfect for my 70s position jazz basses.
I never cut mids, it just doesn't work on stage, but there is an additional midrange control called edge. It's center indent is flat, but cutting yields a rotary slap contour, which, thankfully, doesn't have to be as drastic as most other amp companies make it when they give you a preset button. Boosting is somewhat similar to boosting the mids with the punch setting on. It is sort of a go to midrange control on the fly. In corresponding with Mike, which, by the way, is a real treat, I called it the immediacy control. If your tone is a little too "up front" it is a good control to round it out a bit, and boosting it can help bring more "attack" into your sound.
The bass controls thick and round are both very useful. The deep switch really boosts some low stuff and is great when you're not going front of house. The thick setting has been most useful in a band context. This is where I think bass players have the most trouble in a mix. Often times, bass frequencies just resonant like crazy and don't sound tight or controlled. They also tend to compete sonically with drums and keys. Boosting the bass control makes you realize that you got this preamp from a bass player that understands our unique sonic problems.
The preamp in general just gives your bass a sort of "sonic space". You don't sound like your competing and, in turn, mudding up the other instruments in the group. Since using it, bands I've played in simply sound better. I also don't have to turn up nearly as much. I can hear myself better at lower volume settings, and the bass still sounds full.
All of these controls are great, but thankfully Mike started the whole thing off completely flat. It is a straight to board sound, and to me, that is perfect. The frequency controls are just RIGHT to help us get out of trouble. It's also one of the most impressive low noise/low distortion preamps available.
Other features include 2 mute switches, one cuts out all signal except to tuner out, and the other cuts on stage signal leaving DI and headphone output on. There is a clip light, an input pad, a DI gain sent to a Jensen transformer, a ground lift, a separate line in (for IPod), and a headphone output. This is all incased in a very sturdy single space rack unit. I recommend the preamp highly, and Mike is great to deal with. He's very informed and speaks the bass tone language. Below is a pic of a rig I'll be keeping for a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Admiral Akbar
As a Berg IP user, this is very intriguing. Not to be a jerk but I find it VERY strange that you are running this pre into a WW into MARKBASS cabs??? Not being a snob but wouldn't EA or Epifani be better matches for you? Marbass cabs just sound very boxy to me and exemplify everything you just said you don't want.

Edit: BTW, thanks for the great review. Any word on retail pricing?
 
As a Berg IP user, this is very intriguing. Not to be a jerk but I find it VERY strange that you are running this pre into a WW into MARKBASS cabs??? Not being a snob but wouldn't EA or Epifani be better matches for you? Marbass cabs just sound very boxy to me and exemplify everything you just said you don't want.

Duh, that's why he had to buy this sweet pre, to compensate for the MB cab voicing, LOL!
 
As a Berg IP user, this is very intriguing. Not to be a jerk but I find it VERY strange that you are running this pre into a WW into MARKBASS cabs??? Not being a snob but wouldn't EA or Epifani be better matches for you? Marbass cabs just sound very boxy to me and exemplify everything you just said you don't want.

Edit: BTW, thanks for the great review. Any word on retail pricing?

A bit of a derail but...
The Walter sounds great with my cabinets, but I play many rooms, and many have odd acoustics that change depending on soundmen and the number of people in the audience. I just simply wanted more eq control to help isolate some of those problem frequencies especially in the bass region. The Walter's preamp is also not FLAT when it is straight up 12:00. I prefer to have that position as a starting point. The MPP-1 is FLAT when all knobs are straight 12:00.
Regarding the Markbass cabinets, I find the Markbass 112s to be VERY natural sounding and very FLAT. They have plenty of low end, and they sound much bigger than they are. All of this, and they are THE most portable 112s available. I don't find them boxy sounding at all. Anyway, this is not a Markbass 112 review, but it seems as if one may be needed.
 
$1,499 according to Mike's website.

I think that that's a very reasonable price. I've always considered the Millennia TD-1 for my own purposes at some point which is in the same ballpark price wise. I'd buy Mike's pre over it though as it's tailored specifically for bass and it offers much more as far as tone shaping.

Mike, any plans to make this into a non rack mount preamp?
 
Great review and I agree with Andy, I think the price is not out of line if you are already in the Fodera/Walter Woods type price range on your gear...

I mostly want to concur with Peter on the 121H cabs, I bought his old 121H combo from a TB'er. It is the biggest sounding 1x12 cab I've had with the best mid response and best sounding tweeter. I wish they were still making the 121H cab with the old dimensions (19" instead of 23", which makes it kind of long) but it has to be the most overlooked 1x12 cab on the market. If you've only heard the little 121P combo you need to hear the 121H!
 
Yes, I agree 100%. The 121H doesn't sacrifice for portability. Another interesting thing about the cabinet is that Markbass uses a passive tweeter design. This means that flat is actually all the way up. There was a BIG improvement when I ran the tweeter flat. Cutting the L-pad at all gradually cuts everything above 3.5k.