• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

MM Stingray vs. G&L L-2000

I've owned both.

Both are *very* nice basses - no complaints.

But they are different. The G&L is much more versatile with a more attractive finish. The only downside was that the instrument didn't have it's own "personality" - which I guess is what you get when you have a zillion tone options.

The EB, to me, is a one trick pony - but it does that track like no one's bidness. It has a *sound*, and that sound cuts through the mix very well - but it's pretty much one sound, much like a P-bass.

So they are really quite different - apples & oranges.
 
I personally have never felt that an L2000 can cop Stingray tones. Soloing that bridge PUP gives you a beefier, aggressive J tone, IMO, not a 'Ray tone.

I think the L2000 can do a reasonable Stringray-ish tone if you wire up the series/parallel switch allow for selecting the inner coils of the two pickups. Do that, turn on both pickups, and you're relatively close.

I agree about soloing the bridge pickup. The bridge PUP just isn't in the right spot to do that sound.

No matter how I set the electronics on my L2500, its still sounds like a G&L, though (A good thing, IMO). You're never going to get it to sound exactly like something else.