Benjamin Strange
Commercial User
- Dec 25, 2002
- 9,737
- 310
- 49
- Disclosures
- Owner / Tech: Strange Guitarworks
DigMe said:Is that supposed to be some kind of innendo?
brad cook
It's supposed to be menudo.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
DigMe said:Is that supposed to be some kind of innendo?
brad cook
Benjamin Strange said:It's supposed to be menudo.
I speak Italian and I can't think of an English translation for it. It's probably just a common surname in the ilk of Jones or Wilson.DigMe said:After all it's not like Beretta is a common word...does it even have a meaning in Italian or is it just a name?
brad cook
DigMe said:Huh... I never knew what became of that lawsuit. I just assumed Beretta won since I don't ever really see Berettas around. I think that had more validity than the Monster suit has. After all it's not like Beretta is a common word...does it even have a meaning in Italian or is it just a name? If it's just a name I'd have to think that they got the name straight from the gun.
brad cook
ApeIsHigh81 said:That's it, I'm goin' around sucker punching every guy that has my first name.
embellisher said:The Beretta was a POS disposable car. That's why you never see them around.
DigMe said:Oddly enough I ended up driving behind one on the way to work this morning.
brad cook

what makes this stupid is that "monster" is a very common word. it's not like their company is called Hyundai, or Starbucks, or Nabisco, or anything like that. if they wanted to own the name of their company this completely, they should have made up something original to name themselves.Mark Latimour said:Okay a little bit of googling has revealed a little bit more "truth" about what Monster Products Inc ("Monster") are doing. This may help alleviate some of the "hysteria" that is going on here.
The thing is it doesnt appear that they are trying to "reserve" the right to use the word "monster" per se, what they are doing is stopping other people marketing products that use the word "monster" as part of the product.dancehallclasher said:what makes this stupid is that "monster" is a very common word. it's not like their company is called Hyundai, or Starbucks, or Nabisco, or anything like that. if they wanted to own the name of their company this completely, they should have made up something original to name themselves.
Mark Latimour said:I guess we just don't like the big guy?![]()
Mark Latimour said:The thing is it doesnt appear that they are trying to "reserve" the right to use the word "monster" per se, what they are doing is stopping other people marketing products that use the word "monster" as part of the product.
I think they have already settled with Monster.Com.
Apparently there wern't any "monster" companies around when they came onto the market in 79, otherwise the other company may have a better claim to the use of the name "monster" for a product.
cassanova said:If they're not tryin to reserve the right to use the word monster, then how come they were eyeing the NFL for using the term "Monsters of the Midway?"
http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=219818 said:Monster Wrongfully Accused: A Note from Noel Lee, CEO of Monster Cable Products.
There have been a lot of rumors, misinformation, and false accusations spread on the web about Monster Cable and its trademark and brand protection efforts. We have been wrongfully accused of suing any company using the Monster name, and as being a corporate bully.
Anyone who knows our company, or me personally, knows that we are not that kind of company, and I am not that kind of person. The information out there is categorically untrue.
Being a champion of the entrepreneur, and having started Monster in a garage with no money myself, I would be the last person to want to stop someone who had a legitimate right to use a trade name for their business. Those who know me and have met me, know that we have built a fantastic company from nothing through sheer hard work and a lot of sweat equity. You can check out our story at: Invalid Link Removed and Link Removed
I have even spoken at several colleges about how to become an entrepreneur, and value these opportunities. In fact, my parents were on one of the last boats out of China during its civil war. I truly have lived the American dream, and I am not going to prevent others from achieving it. I feel fortunate to have been born an American.
Some of the negative press you have read may have started with some newspaper articles that have mistaken information in them, or others who have found this opportunity to spread negative press for their own agendas.
Snow Monsters mistakenly portrayed that our objection to their attempt to register trademarks was a lawsuit, which isnt true. We have not sued Snow Monsters. We would never try to harm a company whose focus is on ski education programs and products for children.
In fact, Monster is a big supporter of programs for children. You can see what we have recently done with kids at Monster Park. Link Removed. The videos with Yomi Agunbiade, director of Recreation and Parks, that is up on our web site shows our compassion for kids at the opening of Monster Park. Link Removed
Before you form any negative impressions of my company or how I have directed it, permit me to straighten out some of the misconceptions.
1) We do not have any trademark infringement lawsuits pending, and we do not object or take action against businesses just because they sell products that have Monster in their names. If we did, we would never be able to run our business, not to mention the financial burden would crush us. We have better things to do than spend this kind of money and time.
2) There are over 1,100 registered Monster trademarks in the U.S. Patent and Trademark office, and probably hundreds more that are unregistered. We dont have any intention of suing them or taking any action against them. These marks have been allowed by the Trademark Office, just as our 50+ marks in the various classes listed below.
3) We have not sued or filed actions against the hundreds of companies that are using the word Monster. So if anyone is representing this to you, they are not right and should be corrected.
What I think has happened, is people are misinterpreting the U.S. Patent and Trademark offices database. When you do a search on the USPTO database for Monster, it brings up a bunch of records dating back to 1983; like a Google search does. It appears people are seeing the search results and assuming they are lawsuits. They are not lawsuits. In fact, most of the search results are duplicate listings or merely requests for 60 day extensions (which allow us to do further investigation to see if there are any potential conflicts). The database shows Monster has opposed about 80 trademarks over the last twenty years. Thats about 4 trademark oppositions a year, which isnt very many for a company that has over 50+ Monster trademarks and is a famous brand.
Dont just take my word for it, please search the database for yourself.
(Click on the links and you will see the words Extension of Time on many of them).
http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?...=&pn2=&cop=&cn=
4) Trademark registrations and trademark oppositions are decided by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, not us. Even if we do object to a particular filing to register a trademark, it is the Trademark office that determines if the business or person filing for the trademark registration is entitled to it, NOT US.
5) Our examination and investigation of businesses filing trademarks with our name Monster is normal processes for any company having a trademark that they want to protect. We know we don't own the word Monster; however like any other trademark holder we do have the right and need to protect our Monster brand when it is in danger of being diluted, tarnished, or infringed.
6) The federal trademark law says that we are required to police our marks and enforce them or we will lose them, or risk weakening them. We didnt make these rules. Congress and years of Supreme Court rulings have determined the rules of the game. This type of protection is authorized by federal and state statutes (referred to as anti-dilution laws) designed to prevent the weakening of a famous mark's reputation. For more information, you may want to check out: Nolo Press (http://www.nolo.com/lawcenter/ency/...7EF7D691972BE58)
7) Anyone can use a trademark without having the trademark registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark office, as long as it doesnt infringe or dilute someone elses trademark. This is referred to as a common law trademark. There are many trademarks that exist under common law rights.
In the case of Snow Monsters, we have NEVER sued them, and we are not trying to harm their company. I think that their products are great and dont cause us any problems, I have written them and told them so. They are also using the word monster for characters, not as a brand, which is how we use Monster. Please, see the list of our trademarks below that I have provided for you.
8) I hate frivolous lawsuits as much as the next person, and would never engage in a lawsuit that was frivolous. They are a waste of the publics money, and the time of the parties involved. In fact, the courts do not allow frivolous lawsuits to proceed. The courts have procedural safeguards to eliminate frivolous lawsuits, as well as penalties (like Rule 11) that can be levied against attorneys and parties who bring such suits. We have never been accused by a court of filing frivolous lawsuits.
9) The newspaper articles and other rumors that said we sued the Chicago Bears, Boston Red Sox, Fenway Park, or a Cajun restaurant are all untrue. We have NEVER filed any lawsuits or other actions against them. Dont just take our word for it, do a search of the court records, and the USPTO database, and we can guarantee that you will find that we have not sued (or even filed trademark oppositions) against these companies.
10) There are millions of Monster fans who love our company and love our products. My passion for the products and unrelenting drive to innovate and create the highest quality products is well known in the industry and with consumers. Where most companies find out how to take quality out of something to reduce costs, we find how we can improve products and make them the best of class. Thats why our customers love Monster products.
I am very sad indeed to see misinformation out there as it wrongfully portrays the company to be a corporate bully, when nothing could be further from the truth.
If anyone wants to talk with me about this, or if this email does not answer your questions, please email me at [email protected]. Although I may not get back to you immediately since I am currently on travel, I will get back to you.
In the meantime, I ask everyone not to prejudge until you know all of the facts.
Hope this clears things up for you. We merely want to protect the trademarks that it has taken me 25 years of hard work to build.
If anyone else is under a wrong impression about our intention otherwise, please feel free to pass this on.
Monsterously yours,
Noel Lee
The Head Monster
Monster Web Site
http://www.monstercable.com
Here is the list of our registered Monster trademarks. We have many more that are pending registration.
Class 6: Electronic Cables and Wires
Monster Cable
Class 9: Consumer Electronics
In class 9 we have the following registered trademarks, some which date back as far as 1978:
Monster
Monster Cable
Monster Power
Monster Music
Monster Batteries
Monster Car Audio
Monster Central
Monster Computer
Monster Internet
Monster Digital
Monster Game
Monster Home Theatre
Monster Lock
Monster Microphone
Monster Mobile
Monster Mounts
Monster Multimedia
Monster Networking
Monster Satellite
Monster Sport
Monster Standard
Monster Tips
Monster USB
Monster Wire America
Class 16: Consumer Electronics
Monster
Monster Connection
Class 18: Leather Bags and Apparel
Monster Design
Class 25: Clothing and Apparel
In Class 25, we have the following registered trademarks, some which date back over 15 years:
I Am A Monster
Monster
Monster Attitude
Monster Design
Monster Sport
Class 35: Advertising and Marketing Services
eMonster
iMonster
Monster Bucks
Monsterbook
Monsterguide
Class 36: Financial Services
Monstermoney
Class 41: Entertainment, Educational and Training Services
Monster Music
Monster Style
Class 42: Research and Development Services
Monster Music
Monsterlinks