Absolutely bang on. Consider that the "Basses" forum is the busiest on this board. Technique and General Instruction have a tenth of the number of threads.....
Actually getting better is very hard work. It is more fun to talk about gear!

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Absolutely bang on. Consider that the "Basses" forum is the busiest on this board. Technique and General Instruction have a tenth of the number of threads.....

It gets broken down thusly:
You start playing bass. Cheap bass. Cheap amp.
You get pretty good and say "I need better $hit"..you go buy it.
You continue to improve and say "A player like me deserves another bass.."
You go buy it.
6-7 years down the road you get more excited to buy new stuff than to actually play.
Your playing suffers and before you know it, you are wearing Hawiian Shirts and playing blues with tube socks and white tennis shoes on with a $3,000 6 string and $2,500 rig...
And then THIS thread comes along...because of..that.....guy
Don't be him.
So I was talking to a few very skilled bassists the other day (one of them records for esperanza spalding!) and they both said you Shouldn't have more than one bass. The exception being if you play a fretless and a fretted.
The logic behind it is if you play more than one bass you'll never be amazing at playing one of them. You should get to be "best friends" per say with your main bass and the better you know it the better you'll play.
I countered this with "But victor wooten playes like a billion different fodera's including 6 strings and fretless" (I know his fretless isn't fodera) the reply was "Yes, but he only does the vic thing on his 4 string"
Another point brought up is people like Justin Raines. He has 2 basses, but there both MTD's and probably setup identically.
So my question is this. Does having more than one bass hinder your playing. If you have 2 basses should they be of the same builder or brand?
I know there are alot of one bass threads, but I couldn't find one like this
. But if you endorse a certain brand, you can have that endorsement yanked if they see you on stage with something else.
I do think there's something to familiarity - think of players like Eric Clapton or BB King whose voice is the result of so many years on a single instrument that speaks for them. Basswise, perhaps there's more variety, but Jack Bruce, Jack Casady, Phil Lesh, and a few others come to mind. Of course they've used a variety of instruments over their whole career, but which instrument's tone do people think of when speaking of that artist's "sound"? Usually it's a particular instrument.
Your friend's argument doesn't justify having just one bass, it justifies having a main bass; which everyone does.
I thought most of the basses got sold after his death.
They could have very well been...I only remember that he had some financial problems throughout the end of his life...
Whenever I hear someone spout "You Should" or "You Shouldn't", I turn the other way and run.
I currently own only 1 bass: a MIM Fender P, which I'm very happy with. Recently I've been thinking of saving to get a Modern Player Jaguar because of the thinner neck. My theory is that my P-Bass would be my main axe, and I would use the Jag for live performances ie: the thinner neck would be faster and easier to play. So in short, practicing on something "difficult" to play, preforming on something "easy" to play.
You have hit the NAIL on the HEAD - thats exactly the point, from my perspective. I have lots of gear, but I definately play a MAIN BASS, thats what I'm comfortable with, thats what my fingers naturally work well with, and so thats what I would (Shoud) play as a first "go to" bass.
Well described !
Rob
I do the "main bass" thing too, but the point is *does it make you a better bassist*? From my experience, no, because when I've had to I've played gigs on "other" basses and my playing didn't suffer at all.
So while this may be a natural tendency, it does not seem to me to follow that this is a useful way to get better. Perhaps the opposite is actually true: if we all always stretched our comfort zones playing on many different basses maybe that would make us all better players?
I do my "Roy" thing on two basses, a fretted Carvin Icon 6 and a fretless Carvin Claro Walnut LB76.
Everything else is for my "sideman/hired gun/session rat" thing where I think the more tones/colors/vibes you can bring to a project the better.
IMHO, it depends on what kind of player you are and what you want to do with it. Jaco was pretty much married to two Jazz Basses, Brian Bromberg basically plays iterations of his personal design, Stanley has his short-scale Alembics, etc. There's a good argument for an Artist to use one bass to create a personal sound and to really get close to.
It's a little different as a session player. A lot of session guys I know will bring several instruments to a recording session (I typically bring at least 3 plus 2 uprights-acoustic and electric) because you never know what will work. At the end of the day I may need to sound like someone who has played Rock, Country, Southern Gospel, Black/Urban Gospel, Bluegrass or Jazz like that's all he has done all his life so I'm not sounding like me anymore. I like what Joe Osborne said about this type of work, he said it's a "service occupation". Of course, it's a little more complicated 50 years later. When he started he just needed his Jazz Bass, a pick, and those really old Labella flats.