I’m more appreciative when bands “leave us” in order:
Emerson Lake and watch-out Carl Palmer
CSN&Y
Captain & Tennille
Sonny & Cher
Emerson Lake and watch-out Carl Palmer
CSN&Y
Captain & Tennille
Sonny & Cher
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
John Lennon was either first or only child. I think George was actually the last of 4.
Well, until you bring data, it's meaningless speculation on the basis of no information.Okay I'll tell what made me think about this. I read an interview with Peter Buck of REM who said that his younger brother or maybe two, was or were better guitar players than he.
Of course it's complex. The person needs to have an interest and aptitude in music to begin with, for example.
Hypothesis:
Personality type has an influence on instrument of choice. Older siblings are more likely to be a singer, lead guitarist or other type of upfront solo role, while meeker middle children end up in the rhythm section.
Does anyone else think about this subject?
It seems like many of the groundbreaking artists were often firstborn.
No, I'm not one either.
Well, until you bring data, it's meaningless speculation on the basis of no information.
Here's what I'd suggest.
1) Make up a list of 100 musicians you consider "groundbreaking" . Cover all genres, or just one.
2) Determine the birth order of each one. Exclude people with particularly unusual family histories like someone with three older siblings who'd all left home by the time the individual in question was a small child, for example.
3) Detemine the distribution of birth orders for your sample of "groundbreaking musicians".
4) Apply the appropriate statistical tests to determine whether the frequency of first, last, only, middle birth order positions in your sample is statistically different than chance.
5) Report back here with your findings.
Bon chance!
So many families have such a small sample size to gather data from that making any conclusion or correlation may just be confirmation bias.
I thought this would be about what instruments people are drawn too based off birth order. IE First borns like to be lead singers.
There was a trend for many years to try to correlate birth order with interests, talents, IQ, personality type, etc. With more real critical study, most of that has been thrown into question, if not totally debunked. I'd like to see the birth order numbers on 1,000 of the most successful musicians throughout history.
Both Eddie Van Halen and Stevie Ray Vaughan were second born. I'm sure there are more.