TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You must not be familiar with Steve Gadd’s performance on Aja. Or maybe you aren’t familiar with “Celebrity Skin” by Hole. I’d argue that performing Aja correctly and with feeling is more difficult and respectable than writing/bashing out some of the grunge classics of the 90’s. For the record, I grew up on 90’s grunge. I can go in the garage right now and write something on par with Celbrity Skin. And I mean write and perform each part for each instrument. It doesn’t take much creativity to bash out power chords over tired chord progressions... covering complex pieces of music might not take much creativity either, but it certainly takes more talent. That’s why I said I find it more respectable.Unless you're talking about the actual Steely Dan – you know, the ones that wrote those songs – the answer is yes.
Yeah I get that it’s funny on its own... what’s even funnier is that he’s the person that wrote it. Irony much?Yea, really. Lighten up. The quote is funny on its own, whether or not you agree what it was aimed at.
Some of the arguments on TB get so obtuse that it's not even clear what is being argued anymore, let alone whether or not it has anything to do with the original post. And YES, I am sometimes guilty of it myself.
I have written a lot of original music that I can't get other musicians to play, because it isn't easy. The chord forms are not simple. The changes are not predictable. The rhythms are sometimes challenging.I feel we have taken a lot of time and energy discussing the merits of covers vs originals. We’ve also placed the blame on venues, audiences, and “how hard it is” to be an original musician.
But I have yet to see one person in this thread bring up the fact that most original musicians don’t take the time to perfect their craft. To really explore music and improve their skill set. To study great songs and songwriters and dissect what it was that set them apart from the rest. How many original musicians really take the time to become the best they can be at their instrument, or take vocal lessons to improve their singing? Are they studying poetry and great lyricists while taking note of the importance of timing? Are they aware of how certain words/sounds affect the relationship between your mouth and vocal cords and adjust their lyrics accordingly? ........Or is it simply easier to blame the venue, the audience, the internet, cover bands, and everyone else that simply “doesn’t get” your “genius”?
What a great, witty comeback ... not.
Good points. That’s why I said earlier that even when someone comes along that writes good originals (which is rare), he/she still needs to find a group of musicians that are on par and share the same vision (even more rare)... then and only then is there a good original band.I have written a lot of original music that I can't get other musicians to play, because it isn't easy. The chord forms are not simple. The changes are not predictable. The rhythms are sometimes challenging.
I play original music that was written by other people in bands because it's mostly what bands want to play. If you bring something non-standard in to the average group of musicians, at best they'll usually tell you it's no good and at worst they'll try to dumb it down. So I don't bring my own music in anymore. No one's interested in being challenged in a creative setting. They just want to make up something simple.
Only if your band is called Radiohead or NirvanaWhat is the definition of “original”?
Using Google Translator, I entered lyrics to a popular song, translated from English to Spanish to German to French and back to English. Would these be considered “original” lyrics?
It is not the satisfaction that I can not, I can not satisfy.
Make sure you try and try and try
Neither is it, I can not, I can not help.
As I am driving, a car and a person who comes on the radio.
And tell me, a little more useless information;
Care under fire
No it’s not. Those names were already taken.Only if your band is called Radiohead or Nirvana
LolNo it’s not. Those names were already taken.
+1Well, my tribute band last weekend sold out a small, but pro-level venue, $20 a ticket....so I guess that's not too bad for a band that lacks emotion, is only doing other people's music, blah blah blah
by the way, I would say there is almost nothing "original" in original rock or pop music these days. It's all derivative of music from the recent past. A spin on a song or style that's already been done 1,000 times if not a direct rip-off. so what's truly original? IMHO, very little.
it's just all music.
They knew that, that’s why they plagiarized many blues tunes.30 originals? I don't want to hear 30 originals from ANY band. Not even Zep.
When a band tells me that they don't play covers my response is you will. In general original music doesn't fill clubs or dance floors, your location also plays a big part on how original music is accepted. In the mid 80's I was part of the Boston original music scene with the hard rock band EXPOSE, we owned Boston played the biggest venues, packed them in. I've never seen anything like it since.In Louisiana we are expected to do "Swamp Pop" or covers. Anything else is looked at as well as herpes. We will do 2 or 3 covers per show but they are almost unrecognizable after they have been tweaked to "our liking". We have about 30 original songs so we can play for a while. I'm stuck between pushing for what the audience actually wants and what gets them dancing and the creative awesomeness of the band. I'm truly in a tough spot. These are a group of really talented musicians but they don't necessarily have a fundamental understanding of entertainment. We get friends and relatives coming to shows but nobody knows these original songs. I've been trying to get them to go 50/50 as a concession but so far it's been 90/10. I don't think we will ever progress unless we give the audience at least something to get excited about. Thoughts?