TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You know it!"Retro Cream" is worth waiting for.![]()
I am, I see you on there from time to time. That would be me who posted that post yesterday about looking for a cheapo acoustic bass.You know it!
I see you're in Tacoma. Are you part of the Seattle Area Bass Nerds Facebook group?
Oh yeah yeah, I saw that post. Nice to see you here and there!I am, I see you on there from time to time. That would be me who posted that post yesterday about looking for a cheapo acoustic bass.
I'm also part of the "Bass Northwest" group too.
My ancient MOTU 828 just recently died and I replaced it with a 16A. Amazing sounding piece of kit. I immediately noticed an improvement across the board--tighter lows, sweeter high end, nicer stereo spread. Nothing else changed--still listening on my Event ASP8 monitors.If I end up moving away from the Apogee interfaces I'm currently using and move to a MOTU 16A I'll need a dedicated monitor controller and 16 channels of analog preamps
I'm still considering a 16A for the studio. The lack of dedicated headphone outs was an initial concern, but once I realized that any of the 16 analog outputs could be routed to anything through the matrix mixer I realized that for my needs I could route one to a monitor controller's headphone input for me, then I could route as many as I wanted to a patchbay for connection to something like a Behringer Powerplay P1 mounted on a mic stand. That would give the performer control of their headphone level rather than asking me for more or less level to their cans. Three people is about the max I can record simultaneously, and three of these with mic stands would not break the bank.The lack of a headphone output was a challenge
Just as an FYI in case you ever try to use the Mackie MCU Pro to expand your preamp count; It doesn't have any preamps. It's just a control surface. The SSL Nucleus is the only control surface I can think of, outside of digital mixers that can also function as control surfaces, that includes mic preamps.I'm using a Mackie MCU Pro as my control surface (fronting Cubase 10.5). Can't speak to the preamps in it as I don't use them.
These would be solely for the performers’ monitoring needs through a set of iso headphones which are already not nice sounding. My space is a combined control and live room due to space limitations. I need isolation in the cans and sufficient volume. Anything beyond that is prioritized WAY lower. If I’ve got a drummer and keyboardist tracking simultaneously I just need them to hear the click and/or backing track, their inputs mixed independently, and as much of the other player as they want. If that happens and they have their own self-controlled and independent overall volume control I’m in good shape.I've got an ancient Beri PowerPlay Pro XL (the 4 channel guy) and it does an OK job at making headphones loud (sounding good is a different story).
That’s amazing news, tempered by the lameness you’ve gone through trying to get them operational.@mrface2112 your post’s timing is excellent. I finally got Apogee to agree to a refund. My Element 88s are going back and a 16A, two 8-channel preamps, monitor controller and patchbay will be taking its place.
Agreed. Every week there was a new issue.That’s amazing news, tempered by the lameness you’ve gone through trying to get them operational.

Thanks!great work Silky! Drum tones are on point, awesome to hear all the hard work pay off
I screwed up a Massenburg overheads arrangement and as a result the stereo image of the drums is really narrow to the point that it almost sounds like it’s collapsed to mono. Panning the toms helped, but all the cymbals are nearly mono.