Look at us, a bunch of IT guys!Are the number of effects & features the same or at least equivalent to what is available in the HXS? Or does one have more to offer than the other?
I am intrigued by the better/easier UI of the Headrush system.
Since I am Linux only, I don't know if I can run HX Edit, so I would be interested in a system that is fully functional without a laptop/pc nearby.
My take on the two after a short bit - model/amp/effects offering wise, the HXS is definitely way more useful - more bass amp models, more bass useful effects, etc. It's honestly not even close.
Tone wise - it's a tie. Gun to my head, when doing like for like, I think the Helix sounds slightly better - but TBH, it's very, very close. The Headrush though it has way more options for the models that it has, but the HX just nails every single tone.
Ease of use? The HR wins by a lot. You kinda nailed it - you really need a laptop to take full advantage of the Helix, at least IMO/E. Now the downside to the HR is that there is no editing interface on a PC, so you have to do everything on the box itself, which some people may not like. But for me, I far prefer the UI of the Headrush, so much so that I am seriously looking at a Quad Cortex - which is supposed to be even better.
One note about the HX Stomp XL - it's very giggable. The additional footswitches are VERY handy. But again, that takes going into a PC or navigating menus on the screen to set up. It's very powerful for those that want to go that route, but I'm willing to forsake the additional footswitches for that touch screen.
