No offense intended, Les. I was just pointing out that in common usage, some terms are understood by their target audience to mean something different than their actual textbook meaning, and that this isn't really a bad thing AFAIC. As for the reference to mocking, I had no intention of mocking you at all. Relating a scientific/technical post that don't really understand to Einstein has for years been my way of admitting that the explanation is beyond my understanding. I'm sure I've used the same Fuquism in the past with others (i.e. - e=fdeck2, e=mje2, etc. ) posting technical stuff that was over my head. Now that I know you find it disrespectful, I will refrain from using it with you in the future.
![]()
Chris, such is the nature of email and forum posts. Often, intent is difficult to decipher. I see I took your post in a way not intended. Please feel free to use the Einsteinism with me now that I understand how you mean it. As for you not understanding my diatribe, as I mentioned earlier, I'll try to be clearer in the future. Thanks for your response and for all your hard work here on our behalf. All good.
