Brad Johnson said:Sweet... got only one joke about my monster stereo system.
I played many multi band shows sharing the stage with GK+Hartke stacks, Ampeg refrigerators and the like... my "stereo system" moved more air, cut thru and sounded better!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Brad Johnson said:Sweet... got only one joke about my monster stereo system.
frandiaz said:Any of you Thunderfunk owners have use the D.I. for recording or live sound and with what results? I mean good tone, noise free, etc.
TIA
Fran
jerry said:Very cool Brad! I'm still digging mine, and I pretty much bought mine because of how much you raved about your A.M.P.'s. Plus I wanted a lightweight amp for my smaller rig![]()
It's 400 watts is easily louder than my 400 SM400 or Ampeg SVT3Pro that are rated about the same wattage.
frandiaz said:Any of you Thunderfunk owners have use the D.I. for recording or live sound and with what results? I mean good tone, noise free, etc.
TIA
Fran
todd 4ta said:I have a Gibson GB-440 which I believe is kind of between the AMP and the Thunderfunk. I believe the Gibson was the amp that the Thunderfunk was based on.
I don't think there are enough reasons to upgrade from the Gibson to the TF, but what do I know. Has anyone tried both the Gibson and the TF?
I've played mine every Sunday for the past several months, and it absolutely delivers the goods. I was running it through an Epifani 2x12 (4 ohm), and now it's going through an EBS 4x10 (4 ohm).
I'm using my Aguilar DB359 this weekend just to try something different, but I've been really happy with the GB-440.
NeedMoreBass said:I've owned the AMP, the GB440, and the ThunderFunk. The Thunderfunk is a nice improvement over the original GB440 which it is based on. If you can find one for the $500 to $600 range like Brad it is well worth that amount. But $995.00?
BTW, the ThunderFunk IS a GB440 with some better quailty parts.
Brad Johnson said:I wouldn't pay a grand for an amp, IME there's no need (I don't have that original owner hangup). Given that, if I were to spend that much money on an amp I'd spend it on a ThunderFunk long before a comparably priced Eden, SWR, Ampeg, etc.
![]()
BlacksHole said:Brad, you mentioned uipgrades - can you be more specific? SInce you tend to run your amp flat, I'm guessing that the upgrades aren't so much in the eq range (i.e., wider bass control etc.) but rather in routing options, speaker hook ups and the like.

plankspanker04 said:i have been looking at the tf.at the current time im having a custom 112 with a mid driver(650 watt)cab made.i want to go with a 8 ohm cab so i have flexability to add a cab.just wondering if the tf will push it enough at 8 ohms or if im better off with a 4 ohm cab to max the power and get a bigger cab for bigger gigs.