• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NBD: Epiphone Thunderbird Vintage Pro

The Vintage Pro was made in Indonesia, the '64 is made in China. The Vintage Pro has almost no pitch to the neck, the '64 does have a slight pitch.
This makes the bridge sit higher although there's no change in being able to have a nice, low action. The pickups seem slightly different on the '64 as well, I like them more than the 760s on the Vintage Pro - I traded my VP 760's out for Gibson Re-issues and find them far better in every way. YMMV.
Redesign, etc. may have impacted prices. Inflation probably had a bigger effect. Fancier paint adds cost. They may have gone for more margin as well. But look around - most things have gone up noticeably in price the past few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedVee and Engle
Nice, is there a difference between the Thunderbird Vintage Pro and the Thunderbird 64? I see higher prices for the latter but they look similar.
The Vintage Pro was made in Indonesia and I much prefer it to the made in China '64 for a number of reasons. The MIC '64 has a thicker body and a slight neck angle not present on the VP, overall the Vintage Pro is a more accurate representation of a 60's Thunderbird. Because of the thicker neck through section and body wings the '64 is heavier and feels less svelte than the VP. I also find the fretwork better on the VP than the '64. Things I like about the '64, nice faux MOP inlay and the colors available are great! I bought a Ember Red one and probably will buy a purple one.
Having said all that the '64 is a very good Thunderbird and I would take it over a USA Gibson but I would take a Vintage Pro over either.
 
Everyone's always talking about how the Squier Classic Vibe is every bit as good as the USA-made Fender basses, and while that's debatable, there's no doubt about the Epiphone Vintage Pro going up against the Gibson Thunderbird and matching it in every aspect, playability, tone and quality of finish and hardware, etc.
I concur! Epiphone hands down has been building the best Thunderbirds since the introduction of the Classic Pro and Vintage Pro Thunderbirds.
 
Bang for the buck is hard to beat on the Epiphone Thunderbird VP and newer Epiphone 60’s Tbird reissues.

I have both and bought each one new (an Ebony one back in 2018 and a purple flake one in 2024). There are differences but it’s minor stuff that’s hardly noticable unless you hold them side by side. Of the two, I ever so slightly prefer the look and feel of the first run VP over the current 1960’s reissue offering. I actually like the sound of the newer one slightly better. It has a hair deeper voicing for a slightly richer fuller tone, but again it’s hardly noticable unless you play the two back to back.

If I had $800 burning a hole in my pocket my first purchase choice would be a used VP, second would be a new 60’s reissue and third would be a used and now discontinued Epiphone CP. All three are fantastic choices and can cover any genre you can name.
 
Bang for the buck is hard to beat on the Epiphone Thunderbird VP and newer Epiphone 60’s Tbird reissues.

I have both and bought each one new (an Ebony one back in 2018 and a purple flake one in 2024). There are differences but it’s minor stuff that’s hardly noticable unless you hold them side by side. Of the two, I ever so slightly prefer the look and feel of the first run VP over the current 1960’s reissue offering. I actually like the sound of the newer one slightly better. It has a hair deeper voicing for a slightly richer fuller tone, but again it’s hardly noticable unless you play the two back to back.

If I had $800 burning a hole in my pocket my first purchase choice would be a used VP, second would be a new 60’s reissue and third would be a used and now discontinued Epiphone CP. All three are fantastic choices and can cover any genre you can name.
I haven't played a "64" Epiphone Thunderbird; I need to find one and try it. Between the other two, it's all about tone to me. I don't always want a lot of upper mids and highs, but when I do, I can't get them out of the Classic Pro. OTOH, I could never get enough low end out of the Vintage Pro.[1] OTGH, if you want the Angry Piano sound, the VP will do it easily, especially with strings like the Rotosound 66s, but to an extent, even with Ernie Ball Cobalt Flats. I like the feel of the VP neck finish a bit better, but most days I prefer the tone from the CP. That difference in feel is probably just the type of finish (the VP is a burst with translucent neck while the CP is painted white.[2] The tonal differences are primarily the pickups.[3]

Back to the OP - the VP is one of the best Thunderbirds in a long time. It was a good deal at list price new; any of them much below the Epi 64 price today are very good to great deals. Enjoy!


[1] The consensus seems to be this is at least somewhat fixed in the Epi 64 model.
[2] Advice of the Rolling Stones notwithstanding.
[3] Thunderbucker 66s in the VP added some low end.
 
Not just any bar band. These guys are incredible.
IMG_0011.jpeg
 
Who is that?
Not sure what happened. I intended to post this in the Club thread. Anyway, I posted it there too a few minutes ago.

The bassist is Jorgen Carlsson. He was the bassist for Government Mule from ‘08 to ‘23. The drummer is Erik Eldenius. He currently tours with Billy Idol. The guitarist is Cary Park, a SoCal legend who played with Bruce Hornsby, among others. Eldenius lives up at Pine Mountain Club and got them together to do a little show tonight in our clubhouse. A real treat to hear world class touring and studio pros play in a small room. The place was packed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gaolee and kyral210