All valid. The beauty of no formal technique or rubric.100%
i definitely have gotten my technique under control where the unwrapped C is not the "problem" it was at first. but i think i'd still buy one and put it on.
or, am i robbing myself of the opportunity to refine my technique further? or, have i gotten it to more or less the sustainable place and the C string just "is what it is?"
i'm truly not sure.
i see they sell a wrapped E as well. at that point, perhaps i should try that too. only having an unwrapped D and A would be sort of interesting.
i'd like to explore string choices a bit now while i'm playing on this rental. my instrument won't be ready for likely another year (the maker has a long wait list.) by the time we're ordering strings for mine, i'd like to know what I want.
the bottom strings on my rental are pirastro, and they seem great. when my D broke i ordered a varnished gamut D that i honestly don't like very much - it's brighter in a bad way than whatever the old string was.
For comparison, my wife's violin responds instantly and uniformly to her playing - there's no need to form a deliberate consonant on the weaker strokes or thicker strings - some of this is due to modern bow design, but it seems to be mostly tied to developments in string construction, that don't seem to apply to viol because a majority of the players have their heels dug in about being anachronistically "accurate" to the 17th Century.
The advertising on the label is completely accurate; the viol screams to be a virtuoso instrument - it's absurdly capable and responsive. Just need to modernize the parts of the interface that get in the way: keep the underhanded bow, but reduce the mass and normalize the tension and velocity of the strings.
Last edited: