• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

NDB: 1961 Fender Precision

I have not had the neck off of it. According to Rudy's the neck date is 9-22-61. And the Pots are dated to the 35th week of 61. No mention of a body date. If I had to guess I would say it was a burst because the edge of the bass seem to have some darkness to them as if not all the black paint was removed. That being said, if I ever did get it re-finished I would have it done as transparent blond.

The body of the 61 is more crudely sculpted than my 63 which is more refined. The horns on the 61 are chunkier. The 61 is nearly a one-piece ash - just the bottom bout is a second piece of wood.

The Pick guard on the 63 is by Spitfire who makes very nice reproduction guards. You can read about my 63 P restoration here: Fixing up 1963 Precision Bass

I thought it looked like a Spitfire. They're very nice looking guards, but nowhere close to "reproduction," just to be clear for the sake of others learning about old specs. He makes, or purchases, various types of celluloid top layers, and laminates them to modern black and white materials (which he also often laminates himself, in order to get the thicknesses of the layers a certain way). There is no proper "reproduction" of the original first-style tort guards – and likely never will be.

As for burst or blonde, it would not be common for a burst to have been made from ash, while it would have been so nearly 100 percent of the time with a blonde finish. And you can tell from the details of the refin that the entire bass was stripped all the way down to the wood before the new finish was applied. The sealers used prior to Fullerplast (e.g. Homoclad) were easy to strip, and there's no way the black would have bled through to the wood. You're seeing a dark rim that was caused by something else, post refin.

Details aside, it's a sweet bass, and congrats.
 
I thought it looked like a Spitfire. They're very nice looking guards, but nowhere close to "reproduction," just to be clear for the sake of others learning about old specs. He makes, or purchases, various types of celluloid top layers, and laminates them to modern black and white materials (which he also often laminates himself, in order to get the thicknesses of the layers a certain way). There is no proper "reproduction" of the original first-style tort guards – and likely never will be.

As for burst or blonde, it would not be common for a burst to have been made from ash, while it would have been so nearly 100 percent of the time with a blonde finish. And you can tell from the details of the refin that the entire bass was stripped all the way down to the wood before the new finish was applied. The sealers used prior to Fullerplast (e.g. Homoclad) were easy to strip, and there's no way the black would have bled through to the wood. You're seeing a dark rim that was caused by something else, post refin.

Details aside, it's a sweet bass, and congrats.

Regarding your comment earlier about the thickness of the black layer of the guard and second generation torts, I'm not sure if I follow. I compared my guard to some other photos of early 60s guards and it looks the same. For example, check out posts 71 and 75 in my 1963 restoration thread posted above.

Here is the dark area that I'm talking about. Thoughts on what caused this? I assumed it was the edge of the three tone sunburst from unremoved paint.
IMG_5518.jpeg
 
Im really sorry to hear your story. Maybe there is a support group somewhere for people who share your problems with self control. ;)

Seriously though, thats a lovely vintage P bass in every way. Its got a very classy yet still blue-collar look to it, kinda handsome and rugged at the same time.
 
Great bass! I’d leave it as is, natural with tort looks kick-ass IMHO. I have ‘71 Telecaster Bass neck on a stripped ‘69 PBass body.
I also have ‘63 PBass - sunburst, wide chunky neck that I just love. That aren’t making any new pre-CBS basses! Don’t part with it!
 
Im really sorry to hear your story. Maybe there is a support group somewhere for people who share your problems with self control. ;)

Seriously though, thats a lovely vintage P bass in every way. Its got a very classy yet still blue-collar look to it, kinda handsome and rugged at the same time.

I knew that at Talkbass, I wouldn't have to worry about anyone giving me a hard time for making a gratuitous bass purchase :). There seems to be a lot of people here with a similar affliction.
 
Great bass! I’d leave it as is, natural with tort looks kick-ass IMHO. I have ‘71 Telecaster Bass neck on a stripped ‘69 PBass body.
I also have ‘63 PBass - sunburst, wide chunky neck that I just love. That aren’t making any new pre-CBS basses! Don’t part with it!

Thanks Shadven. The 61 neck is very similar to the 63 neck, although the 63 neck feels a bit more slender. The 61 has an ever so slight "U" shape to it, whereas the 63 is more "elegant" in its contour. The slab board on the 61 is really dark - near ebony. The 63 board has more brown in the rosewood.
 
View attachment 4073324

I periodically check vintage Precision bass prices on various websites to see what's out there, mainly because I've had a vintage (1963) Fender and like to follow the market. It's hard to keep track of all the different stores one can check on for prices. But this weekend the Music is Win YouTube channel posted a video that was filmed at Rudy's Music in SOHO. So I thought I'd check their site and see what they had in the realm of vintage Fenders, and I saw this bass.... I really wasn't actively looking to purchase another vintage Precision bass, but the condition of this bass along with what felt like a very good asking price compelled me to go check the bass out in person. I REALLY wanted to find something wrong with this bass in order to dissuade me from buying it because I don't NEED another vintage P bass. I had to come into Manhattan today for a dentist appointment in the East Village. After the appointment I walked down to SOHO. I came in with a very skeptical attitude in an effort to talk myself out of what visually and price-wise was a deal that seemed exceptional. I played through most of my repertoire on this thing. Having owned what I consider to be a very fine example of a Pre-CBS Precision in my 1963 for the past 6 years, I knew what to look for in a vintage bass in terms of playability and sound. This bass has it. Due to my emotional attachment to my 63, it kind of even pains me to say that this 61 plays better than my 63 in some ways.

I sat there in front of the amp with my mind spinning. Was I about to buy this bass?
View attachment 4073345

I frantically texted a friend for advice who encouraged me to go for it. Deep down I knew I couldn't walk out of the store without it. It was too good, and the price - it seemed underpriced, less than many team built Custom Shop basses go for. According to the store, the prior owner of the bass acquired it in 1971 and hasn't changed it since then, which means that it had its original finish stripped before 1971. It has the original nitro pick guard in perfect shape - no cracks in it which is quite rare. It looks amazing. Original pick-ups and pots. The only thing replaced on it are the re-production tuning machines and a graphite nut. It has a slab-board neck dated September 1961. The frets are original and feel great. It's set up really well. It's a two-piece ash body. The maple neck has flame all up and down it. It's hard to see in the picture:

View attachment 4073349

The bass weighs 8.6 lbs. For a player-grade instrument, it kind of doesn't get much better than this. I think the natural finish looks great. I'm not sure what was used to re-finish the body - maybe poly. It has lots of natural checking in it. The neck finish seems original. The case that it is in is insane - totally far out. It's some sort of home-made job. Funky, but it's cool.

I made the decision. They threw in a nice black leather strap to sweeten the deal even more. Next thing I knew I was Ubering back to Brooklyn with this thing.

View attachment 4073352

I got home and laid it out with its cousin:

View attachment 4073354

View attachment 4073356

Well that's it for now. I feel quite lucky to have both of these great early 60's basses. Here are a few more pics I pulled off the website listing.

View attachment 4073360

View attachment 4073361

View attachment 4073362

Quite a piece. Congrats!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DavidBassista
Deep down I knew I couldn't walk out of the store without it.
Yup. I’ve had that exact experience, albeit with a lesser bass. You feel a certain wind go out of you, the knowledge that hundreds of dollars are about to leave your coffers. But it’s also exhilarating and you are resigned to it. You know it’s already done.

Congrats fellow Brooklyn bass dude. Do we get to hear a clip of that beauty?
 
Yup. I’ve had that exact experience, albeit with a lesser bass. You feel a certain wind go out of you, the knowledge that hundreds of dollars are about to leave your coffers. But it’s also exhilarating and you are resigned to it. You know it’s already done.

Congrats fellow Brooklyn bass dude. Do we get to hear a clip of that beauty?

Thanks. I plan on doing some recordings of some of my little solo compositions later this month and I'll post here. I'm waiting till I visit my parents around the holidays where I have access to my B-15 and can play loudly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alexis Duntov
Regarding your comment earlier about the thickness of the black layer of the guard and second generation torts, I'm not sure if I follow. I compared my guard to some other photos of early 60s guards and it looks the same. For example, check out posts 71 and 75 in my 1963 restoration thread posted above.

Here is the dark area that I'm talking about. Thoughts on what caused this? I assumed it was the edge of the three tone sunburst from unremoved paint.
View attachment 4073651

The first-gen tort guards did have thicknesses that were all over the place, and there is shrinkage over the years as well, complicating things. There were also weird situations sometimes, like only w/b layers under the tort. Variation was the norm. But in '64, when they switched to laminating the tort over more stable w/b/w layers, the middle layer was far more consistently thin. Therefore first gen guards are generally thought of as having a thicker black layer (though not necessarily "thick"), while second-gen ones are generally thought of as having a very thin black layer.

It would only be something that would blip on ones radar until the pots and/or body date were checked out. Those things being in order would put one more at ease. As would seeing the guard in person, which would make the material used for the white and black layers plain as day (hard to show in photos).

To me, that darkness around the edge looks more like the artifacts of an amateur refin than the original finish. Plus it makes no sense that everything on the bass would have been taken down to the point at which the original sealer was chemically stripped (evident by the wood grains being clear of sealer). Perhaps I am reading the photos wrong (it's hard to tell from pix), but it looks like that dark stuff is directly over the ash grain, sinking quite a bit into it in places. The pre-Fullerplast finishes were exceptionally easy to chemically remove all the way down to the wood. There's no reason someone would do so on 98 percent of the body only. The ash grain was stripped of its filler, which you don't do by shallowly sanding, only with chemicals. Personally, without having the bass in hand, my gut says it was stripped twice, then clear coated like it is now.

Is the dark area dark brown, or black?
 
Last edited:
Regarding your comment earlier about the thickness of the black layer of the guard and second generation torts, I'm not sure if I follow. I compared my guard to some other photos of early 60s guards and it looks the same. For example, check out posts 71 and 75 in my 1963 restoration thread posted above.

Here is the dark area that I'm talking about. Thoughts on what caused this? I assumed it was the edge of the three tone sunburst from unremoved paint.
View attachment 4073651

You are correct - it's the remnants of the tobacco burst of a 3TSB, or at least a tobacco/brown-bust. I personally would be tempted to remove the (whatever it is) clear coat and have it pro-sprayed with whatever nitro colour you would like... (as it's already not original) but otherwise - rock it! :bassist:
 

Latest posts