• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Neck profiles. Who cares?

Oct 7, 2000
18,619
38,939
New York City
www.joenerve.com
Disclosures
Endorsing artist: Musicman basses
...or actually, who doesn't care?

I used to prefer thin, sterling/jazz like necks. A few years back I was forced to play a 5 string. Not happy about it at first, but eventually got used to it. Would jump back and forth to a 4, and started playing a lot of different basses. After a while it meant nothing for me to jump from 5s with a wide necks, to my 4 string Warwick that feel like a pencil sometimes. I really have no preference anymore. Curious how others many feel the same.
 
Hey Joe, fellow Bongoloid, hope everything is going well for you! :)

I've played many different neck profiles and haven't had any problems (get used to them too), but anyway I have my preferences. The neck profile I like the least from the basses in my arsenal is that of my 2006 Rickenbacker 4003. One of my students has one of those 24-fret Jazz basses made in Korea that Fender recently discontinued, and I absolutely hate that neck (great width, but horrible thickness). On the other hand, while I like the Bongo's neck profile a lot, I still haven't found another bass like the Peavey T-40 in that area. I don't like narrow necks. I don't like thick necks. The T-40's is perfect to me: Wide and very shallow.

Summarizing, this is a picture of something that I definitely don't like:

Ushapeneck.gif


And this is probably the closest representation of something I like I could find:

Flatneck.gif


But again, I can get used to any profile (I think). Just a matter of preference. BTW, I've seen that lots of players hate the feel of a gloss finish on the back of the neck and I have absolutely no problem with it (but of course, that bare wood feel of the Sterling is incredibly nice).
 
I went from playing a Schecter Stiletto to a Traben Tribal sun which felt like a 2x4 compared to the Schecter. My wife got a an SX 5 String for Christams and now even the Traben feels really thin. The Schecter compared to the SX is almost like a sheet of paper. I still can't play everything on the SX that I can play on my four strings mostly because of the width difference and my muscle memory is not calibrated for five strings yet.
 
It's a big deal for me. Certain neck profiles just fit my hand like a glove, and those basses are always the hardest to put down. I switched to 5-string recently and that's muddied the waters a bit, because every 4-string I pick up now feels like a toy. But my 5-string has a great-feeling neck, and that was one of the main reasons I bought it: I picked it up, the neck just melted into my hand, and that was that.
 
I would have thought that differences in things like string spacing would have a much bigger effect on a player. I've owned 9 basses and never really thought about it. For example, I couldn't tell you anything about the profile on my no1 bass without it being in my hand because I honestly can't remember.

EDIT: That being said, perhaps even if you don't pay attention to to the profile of a specific bass, it may contribute to why you like or dislike a bass but "don't really know why".
 
I never used to care. Until I found a bass that really felt right.

I started learning on a friend's Fender Precision, and keep in mind I was 10 years old at the time. I liked the sound but hated the neck, so I always avoided them. I didn't realize at the time that his P had a Jazz neck. When I finally tried a Precision with a P neck, I found "my bass".

D
 
Originally I didn't care cause I didn't know the difference. When I first started, a bass was a bass. Then I started to learn the difference and got really picky. But after going through so many basses recently, I've found that I can adjust to almost any neck (4's and 5's only at least). Though I still do have my preferences, I don't feel quite so picky in most cases, cause if it's comfortable and sounds great, I'll play it.
 
I actually sold one of the best sounding basses I've ever owned because it had a "slim" neck. I always wanted a bass with one of those tobias style assymetrical necks, I finally got one and played for a few years, it sounded great, better than my 5 string jazz, but when it came to playin' improv I was always more comfortable with a bigger neck, I didn't play better, I was just more comfortable, then after I played a Warwick Infinity with one of those bohemuth necks I realized then that I really loved the way I could anchor in and groove. Sold the fast neck and used the cash to pimp my Jazz
 
i've got huge hands and long alien-like fingers, so i prefer a fat, round neck.

thin necks feel like toys in my monstrous mitts. i love how Ibanez basses sound and look, but i feel like im going to snap the neck every time i play one. my fingers also feel a bit crowded. i need a little more room.

Fender P, Musicman, Spector, and Gibson all have pretty nice chunky necks.
 
I can get used to any neck, but I really like Jazz and Lakland necks. I currently own the full range from an Ibanez 4-string that feels like a pencil to a Warwick 5-string that feels like a baseball bat. I've found that for my playing, too thick is a problem but a workable one. String spacing at the bridge really is a much bigger deal for me.
 
I play 6+ strings. Wide and flat is my preference, although I can adapt pretty well to some chunkier necks (like my Schecter neck, or even a Spector Euro neck)... but if you hand me a Warwick I'll probably try stab you with the headstock. Those necks (post '91 when they were made of 48 cubic feet of solid wood) are simply unplayable.