TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You're trying to put bass drivers in a guitar box?
If that's the case, don't expect that wot work well.
Box size, box tuning, those won't be appropriate for good bass use.
The growly tone had nothing to due with the fact that it was a 212. There is no reason to think that thowing a couple of bass 12s in that Peavey cab will give you anything close to the cab you tried at GC.The cab is an old peavey cab and it is sealed. I'm drawing on my influences when looking at 12s. Chris Squire, John Wetton, Jack Bruce and others have used Marshall cabs. I was at GC playing thru a 2x12 cab and I loved the growl I was able to get and not use pedals....If i couldve afforded the 1200$ I'd have grabbed it.
Any thoughts on speakers?? I have a few gigs so no waiting until March.
This ^^^^A used Peavey 4x10 will be far less expensive than a couple of new 12" drivers and will sound infinitely better than anything you do with your cab. Look around. Used Peaveys and Hartkes can be had for much less than $200, with luck, some even in the $100 ballpark.
I did it. Here's how it was done. Whether it was cost effective or aesthetically pleasing is in the eye of the beholder. I was and am still very satisfied with the results in terms of performance.
This was seven years ago, today I would have dumped the tweeters, shifted the position of the 12's and added a 4 or 5" midrange driver with an 800hx crossover circuit. Live and learn. I found the build enjoyable and learned a lot from it.
The box was an old guitar cab I built from RatShack plans in 1982 originally.
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=174767
A good point, but there's a few things to consider about xmax predictions. The first is that your box program is assuming that the driver is receiving 150 wattspure sineat82Hz, and if you were pushing 150w with an 82Hz fundamental- E2, almost right on the button- perhaps half of that wattage would actually be contained in the fundamental, the rest would be harmonics, so xmax wouldn't be approached. Dealing with musical program as opposed to pure sine waves you can expect that usable linear xmax predictions usually run about 3dB low. Also,xmax isbasedon thetravelof thevoicecoil within the magnetic field of the motor, and is very different from xmech, the actual physical limit of the cone/coil travel range. While the xmax of the D12LF is 4.8mm, the xmech is 26.9mm. That allows for a lot of travel beyond xmax before coil slap can occur.
Even more relevent is the xmax spec itself, which is almost arbitrarily arrived at. For instance, technically an Alpha 8 has a zero xmax. I regularly chat with a senior project engineer at Eminence who recently told me that they are now starting to use Klippel analysis of their drivers, which measures the driver in use and calculates the point at which a 10% distortion figure is reached, a far more useful spec than xmax in predicting driver performance. I wouldn't be surprised to see this spec become an industry wide standard that will eventually supplant xmax entirely.
There is a lot of good info in this thread here from Thor.
Including this gem from BFM. It's one of the best explanatons I've seen yet regarding xmax predictions, limitations, and why displacement limited power handling always seems so low, yet we can still play loud, powerful amps on these cabs that on paper should be farting in the wind, yet don't.