• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New EB Cobalt Flats?

They feel a lot stiffer than any rounds I've played even the Elixers that are currently on my Jack Casady! Strange! Like I said I had to adjust the truss rods on my Ric after putting on these strings, and I had the stock rounds on it. Had a small but significant bow in the neck that took at least a 1/4 turn on each rod to dial it out, maybe as much as 1/2 turn because it was a few small adjustments.
 
Where have you seen negative reviews on these strings? These are quite different from your traditional flats in that for me they have better live in a band setting tone than basically any new string I've played. I have limited experience using flats and can only compare to new sets I've tried. When comparing to TI's and Chromes for me out of the pack is no comparison for the Cobalt's being better in every category. Now you have to realize that I'm a lifetime round wound user and these are the closest to round wound you can find I've been told so that may be the reason I'm fascintated with them lol. Either way for me they blow every string I've tried out of the water.

The "negative reviews" I mentioned are here--but, not about these relatively new strings, but anything trying to meet in the middle--these are the first I've tried due to the negative reviews--I've simply kept flats on one and rounds on the other. The reason I 'get" it now--is they're under fingers. They're both lovely in a vacuum....and as I said--compared to traditional flats OR rounds--they don't sound like either. Otherwise, if you like traditional flats sound--not gonna like these....traditional rounds, not gonna like these. I like them a good deal--but, I've always had a love/hate thing with both--I never felt like flats growl enough when I dig in....and rounds are mostly useless to be for their first months of life. These, right out of the gate sound like worn rounds with more fundamental punch. So, again--I like, but at the same time....I'm gonna be hard pressed to let go of my 62RI with flats.

Just to clarify what I meant by "negative reviews"---it was the general feeling about GroundWounds, pressure wounds, and some "bright flats". They kind of don't cater to either camp. I tried these simply because they were the first of the "meet in the middle" that players of both sides have liked to some degree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marial
Thinking about trying a set of these, curious about relative flexibility or tension

For the last year I used DR flats with fairly bright sounding s/c pickups. Those pickups were just switched for split coils. For some reason this has me wanting strings more flexible (and more bright/punchy/grindy) than the DR flatwounds.

Does anyone have experience with DR flats and the cobalt flats on the same bass? I considered buying the regular slinky (50-105), thinking it might be slightly more flexible than the DR. I'm thinking the super slinky (45-100) might be too flexible (i.e. more flexible than 45-105 Sunbeams and closer to TI Flats).

For reference, on this bass I like strings slightly stiffer than Sunbeams (45-105). Nickel Lo-Riders are a hair too tight (mainly the .105 E). Pressurewounds (the set with .106 E) are nice but maybe stiffer than what I want here. And I am one that never got on with TI flats (on a different bass) due to flexibility.
 
Thinking about trying a set of these, curious about relative flexibility or tension

For the last year I used DR flats with fairly bright sounding s/c pickups. Those pickups were just switched for split coils. For some reason this has me wanting strings more flexible (and more bright/punchy/grindy) than the DR flatwounds.

Does anyone have experience with DR flats and the cobalt flats on the same bass? I considered buying the regular slinky (50-105), thinking it might be slightly more flexible than the DR. I'm thinking the super slinky (45-100) might be too flexible (i.e. more flexible than 45-105 Sunbeams and closer to TI Flats).

For reference, on this bass I like strings slightly stiffer than Sunbeams (45-105). Nickel Lo-Riders are a hair too tight (mainly the .105 E). Pressurewounds (the set with .106 E) are nice but maybe stiffer than what I want here. And I am one that never got on with TI flats (on a different bass) due to flexibility.

Do not get the 105s. I would not call these strings flexible.
 
I use the 105's and they are more flexible than the ECB81 chromes i use to run...just sayin'...;)

I agree if you are tension sensitive, the 105's are not what i would describe as "flexible". They are perfect for me, as my band plays down 1/2 step but even at standard tuning i find them very easy to play.

Good Luck!
 
  • Like
Reactions: crucislancer
has anyone had a comparison in tension on these between Labella's lightest gauge and the TE's lightest gauge.
planning on getting the Cobalts, 40-95, that's what i'm use to gauge wise.

had both the Labellas and the TE's in a similar light gauge, the TE's were looser compared to the Labellas's, like to know where the Cobalt flats sit.
 
I use the 105's and they are more flexible than the ECB81 chromes i use to run...just sayin'...;)

I agree if you are tension sensitive, the 105's are not what i would describe as "flexible". They are perfect for me, as my band plays down 1/2 step but even at standard tuning i find them very easy to play.

Good Luck!

I think the .105 set feels great, no problems. Much better than .100 Chromes.
 
Just to add another quick review of these distinctly different new strings for those who might still be curious. I have only one bass, a humble Squier Jazz, and in my band it has to cover a range of 60s/70s music, from early Elton John and Harry Chapin to Steely Dan and Traffic to Santana, Stones, and Tull. For the last few months I have been using Fender 45-100 flats, which I like a lot for their full, clearish (for flats), and meaty sound, but sometimes wished they had a little more bite on E and A strings, so was willing to give the 45-100 Cobalt flats a try. Here are first impressions.

Quirks: None. They string up like any other string, give off no funny smells, make no weird sounds, and do not make your fingers turn strange colours.
Feel: Definitely less smooth than Fenders and all other flats I have tried (most of them), but still easy to slide and shift on, and plucking fingers actually appreciate the extra touch of "grabbiness" they have.
Tension/stiffness: Slightly lower tension than the Fenders and very slightly more flexible, but still considerably tighter and stiffer than TIs.
Sound: Reasonably well balanced across the spectrum; distinctly brighter and a little more articulate than Fenders, esp. on E and A, and all other flats; a bit less "meat" and "heaviness" and bit more bite or "spankiness."

Overall, I like them. The jury is still out, but I will try them out at next rehearsal and maybe at next gig later this month.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ctmullins
Went from Chromes on my P bass to these...EB Cobalt Flatwound strings. Can't wait to record with them, play live etc. They're like magic. To my ears, they're somewhere between Chromes and TI as far as tone goes. The tension is perfect for me, again somewhere between Chromes and TI...the 45-105 set. I love these strings. I've found my string.
I wonder...does Pino really use them? If so, have we heard them recorded yet? Anywhere? Seems like some pretty cool playeres dig them from what the EB website says...I dig them too! Like a mofo...
 
Anyone install the same set of these a few times? I'm finding the silks are the least resilient of any strings I've ever come across. I've had one set on three basses and the silks almost completely gone. I don't really care. I know it doesn't really matter but it's just something I noticed.
 
I got a pair of 45-105

I haven't put them on yet but from what most people are saying I get that

They are very stiff?


image.jpg