• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New flats maybe.

Okay, so I have a year-and-a-half old set of chromes on my P, and I'm looking for a new sound. I want that flatwound sound but not thumpy. I've heard a lot of good about TI jazz, but how do they age? Yes I know they are low tension.

Any suggestions to other brands?
 
Okay, so I have a year-and-a-half old set of chromes on my P, and I'm looking for a new sound. I want that flatwound sound but not thumpy. I've heard a lot of good about TI jazz, but how do they age? Yes I know they are low tension.

Any suggestions to other brands?

The TI flats will give you a new sound, they sound like flatwounds, are not thumpy but warm with some brightness to them, and they age beautifully. The set on my old P bass are 8 years old now and have been played a lot. I was thinking of maybe changing them for a new set but they sound so good, why bother?
 
I have a ~1 month old set of Steve Harris signature rotosound flats on my fretted Jazz (CIJ ´62 reissue with original MIA fender pickups). The strings are quite thick (E string = .110) and the tension is very high. I was even afraid to tune them up all the way to standard tuning... I bought them originally because I wanted to tune DGCF, but I tuned up to standard tuning anyway after a while. I just had to tighten the trussrod first.

So far I like the sound of these strings, both in D and E tuning. They're still quite bright so even slapping (but not popping) sounds good to my ears; just perfectly lo-fi for my taste. :)

I have TI's on my Squier vintage modified fretless jazz. They have a much lower tension but they sound good, but more DB-like.

I think as a general rule the lower tension, the thumpier the sound, so I'd go for a set with higher tension if I wanted a less thumpy sound. I just have to add that I don't have much experience in flats so I might be wrong. It's only my engineer mind that want to think it's like this... :)

I have also once tried a light set of Chromes on a fretless P that I borrowed from a friend of mine a year ago, and they a had quite high tension as well.
 
I have a ~1 month old set of Steve Harris signature rotosound flats on my fretted Jazz (CIJ ´62 reissue with original MIA fender pickups). The strings are quite thick (E string = .110) and the tension is very high. I was even afraid to tune them up all the way to standard tuning... I bought them originally because I wanted to tune DGCF, but I tuned up to standard tuning anyway after a while. I just had to tighten the trussrod first.

So far I like the sound of these strings, both in D and E tuning. They're still quite bright so even slapping (but not popping) sounds good to my ears; just perfectly lo-fi for my taste. :)

I have TI's on my Squier vintage modified fretless jazz. They have a much lower tension but they sound good, but more DB-like.

I think as a general rule the lower tension, the thumpier the sound, so I'd go for a set with higher tension if I wanted a less thumpy sound. I just have to add that I don't have much experience in flats so I might be wrong. It's only my engineer mind that want to think it's like this... :)

I have also once tried a light set of Chromes on a fretless P that I borrowed from a friend of mine a year ago, and they a had quite high tension as well.

The Thomastic flats are lower tension but they are not thumpier. I've been using them for more than 8 years on all my basses. Compared to others they are livelier, have a brighter attack and a more resonant sound. I've been playing on many different brands and types of strings over the past 48 years. The Thomastics are my favourite.
 
To each their own, but I hated the TI flats on my 55-01. I've used Lakland Joe Osborn flats (stainless steel) for about a decade now and love them on my fretless five string and on my Tokai P-Bass. I usually get a hybrid set that are the lighter weight on the (B,)E&A strings and the heavier weight on the D&G. For a (6+ years) long time I had the lighter weight set on the fretless but ultimately I decide that the G string was too light. Well, that and a friend borrowed it and forced the issue - broke the G string.

To be fair, I've just taken the same JO strings off the 55-01 because I wanted to go to rounds on it. Still, I don't like the big, fat B string. The TI's aren't for me at any rate.

I've also put Fender branded stainless steel flats on a couple of old fretlesses ('69 Fender P and a '79 Stingray) and didn't particularly care for them. I've got a set still in packaging in my basement still and will probably give them another go, but they don't seem right to me.

KO
 
Okay, so I have a year-and-a-half old set of chromes on my P, and I'm looking for a new sound. I want that flatwound sound but not thumpy. I've heard a lot of good about TI jazz, but how do they age? Yes I know they are low tension.

Any suggestions to other brands?

I was on the prowl for new flats too. I went with TI Flats and never looked back. They sound and feel great. I prefer a low action and just enough "thump/deadness/whatever" that flats give you. The TI's are bright enough and although they mellow out a bit after more use, they tone is great. With a good preamp and eq'ing u can get it to sound whichever way u want really. If you're dissatisfied with the 'thump', try lowering your gain and inc your volume. A good tube amp helps.

As for the 'low tension', don't let others' reviews and sensitivity about that bother you. I find they're mostly exaggerating. The tension is FINE. If you find it hard to play, it's just a clash with your style/technique.

I was also looking at Labella Deep Talking bass strings. These are awesome too. They were a used pair i got so obviously it didn't have that stickiness to it that new flats tend to have. Just been too busy loving the TI's to play more with the Labella's tho.