• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New Headless in the works.

Legitimate question: Is the point of a headless bass to decrease overall weight? To obviate neck dive? Combination of those two factors and perhaps others? I never saw the appeal, but then again I've never played any headless instrument so I'm curious as to why they're so popular with some folks.

Headless basses won't necessarily be light, but the weight will be concentrated in the body, not the headstock, so it's not just neckdive but the balance in general. Taking the headstock off changes the resonance of the neck (and thus moves the dead spot), helps it fits in a guitar bag so it's easier to fly with... Looks can factor into it, either for or against.

I dunno. I think they look cool. I'd rock one but the right one never came along at the right time.
The in-line tuners don't induce string twist, make for quick string changes (especially if using double ball end strings), and the quality ones seem inherently more stable (tuning wise) than traditional machine heads.
The tuners are also right at hand when trying to correct your tuning mid-song, while you're fretting a note...no awkward reach over to access your tuners.
Some headless designs (think Status) have a section of string beyond the nut, before termination (Status calls this a "bend well") where you can press on the string to bend harmonics or add vibrato, just like you would on a Jazz or P bass.
This is all in addition to the weight, balance, compactness, and playability factors already mentioned.
Aesthetics can be hit or miss, depending on your tastes, but there's no denying that the minimalist, new concept and material design of the Steinberger set the bass world on its ear.

Like every other aspect of bass (axes, amps, pedals, etc.) it's all what works for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4SG
Just finished it today. I still need to place clear poly on the headstock cuts, clean-up the marks on the back of the body and install a new nut. Right now I just want to play it.
Here are the specs followed by some pics:

Custom body by Tauro Wood Works - Ash
Warhead Short Scale Neck by Warmoth (32”) - modified for head clamp
Warmoth pickguard
250k volume pot
Stellartone ToneStyler Bass 10 (tone control)
Bridge by Guyker (Amazon)
Head Clamp buy OVSAL (Amazon)
GuitarFetish GFS KPB02 pickup (MusicMan style humbucker) wired full range.
DiAddario EXL170 (.100, .80, .65, .45.)

I was pleasantly surprised by the GuitarFetish pickup. Great definition, hotter than the standard MM, very punchy. Not bad at all and only $38.

IMG_0480.jpeg
IMG_0481.jpeg
IMG_0482.jpeg
IMG_0483.jpeg
IMG_0484.jpeg
IMG_0486.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I've owned several headless in the past and the general method of protecting the tuner knobs was either to build an arch in the bass butt and the 'butt cheeks' would protrude out a little further than the tuners and thus protect them (Figures 1, 3 and 4). Ibanez has a notch that protects the knobs but can retain the full rounded body look. Not sure how easy it would be to access the knobs for tuning though, especially the G string (Figure 2).

View attachment 7278946


I feel the most exciting development in headless hardware has been the relatively recent introduction of top mounted tuners like NS Design and Riviera. My headless uke bass from Lignum has the Riviera hardware and it is much easier to tune and looks great. I suppose the hard part about such top mounted hardware is the extra routing that is probably required. But I like big round full bass butts.
View attachment 7278947
View attachment 7278948
View attachment 7278949


Got myself a new build in the works with Riviera and a Moses neck, based on a Yamaha Attitude

1000124035.jpg
1000124036.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: lark_z