Legitimate question: Is the point of a headless bass to decrease overall weight? To obviate neck dive? Combination of those two factors and perhaps others? I never saw the appeal, but then again I've never played any headless instrument so I'm curious as to why they're so popular with some folks.
The in-line tuners don't induce string twist, make for quick string changes (especially if using double ball end strings), and the quality ones seem inherently more stable (tuning wise) than traditional machine heads.Headless basses won't necessarily be light, but the weight will be concentrated in the body, not the headstock, so it's not just neckdive but the balance in general. Taking the headstock off changes the resonance of the neck (and thus moves the dead spot), helps it fits in a guitar bag so it's easier to fly with... Looks can factor into it, either for or against.
I dunno. I think they look cool. I'd rock one but the right one never came along at the right time.
The tuners are also right at hand when trying to correct your tuning mid-song, while you're fretting a note...no awkward reach over to access your tuners.
Some headless designs (think Status) have a section of string beyond the nut, before termination (Status calls this a "bend well") where you can press on the string to bend harmonics or add vibrato, just like you would on a Jazz or P bass.
This is all in addition to the weight, balance, compactness, and playability factors already mentioned.
Aesthetics can be hit or miss, depending on your tastes, but there's no denying that the minimalist, new concept and material design of the Steinberger set the bass world on its ear.
Like every other aspect of bass (axes, amps, pedals, etc.) it's all what works for you.