Gigged last night and tonight with the WD800 and a pair of Berg HD112s. Simply outstanding! Can’t stop grinning.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Quite an imagination you have there! Lol
Gigged last night and tonight with the WD800 and a pair of Berg HD112s. Simply outstanding! Can’t stop grinning.
Is it just me or is the WD fond of 12’s? Asking for a friend.
All this great word of mouth about the WD has got me curious...
Has anyone ever compared the Darkglass MT900 vs WD800?
I know these are different animals primarily due to the OD pedals built into the DG head.
Any thoughts?
I couldn't agree more, I'm so glad I just went for it and got it.The WD800 otoh had me from the first note, and I like it more and more. It is by far the most flexible *and* easiest to get a good sound out of head I've had. Set everything at noon - sounds great. From there they sky is the limit.
To make it sound differentThat’s so weird- why swap a tube in a floor demo amp?
IME this is because many people assume engineers spend half their time cutting costs in product design and figure that without a single calculation or any insight what so ever into the design itself they can make an instant improvements by swapping parts. Unfortunately their quick look at individual part specs through a one dimensional lens completely ignores a system trade space look that tells the story of a balanced design solution, thoughtfully developed through many hours of engineering analysis. That's my take on it anyway...That’s so weird- why swap a tube in a floor demo amp?
Generally, cost cutting isn't something that I am saddled with when designing new products. These are the same tubes we use in the highest end guitar and bass amps we make (or made), and we back it up with the longest warranty in the industry too.IME this is because many people assume engineers spend half their time cutting costs in product design and figure that without a single calculation or any insight what so ever into the design itself they can make an instant improvements by swapping parts. Unfortunately their quick look at individual part specs through a one dimensional lens completely ignores a system trade space look that tells the story of a balanced design solution, thoughtfully developed through many hours of engineering analysis. That's my take on it anyway...
Generally, cost cutting isn't something that I am saddled with when designing new products. These are the same tubes we use in the highest end guitar and bass amps we make (or made), and we back it up with the longest warranty in the industry too.
It's too bad these assumptions are made, then propagated around the internet. Some of the blame comes from the tube resellers, but guess where all those raw "screen-out" tubes that don't meet our performance or baseline reliability specs end up??? Often these very resellers.
What do you call "for mostly home use"? For several years my old band practiced in my basement at levels that required everyone wear earplugs (not sure why we had to practice so loudWhich cab would you guys recommend with the WD800 for mostly home use?
). That "for mostly home use" required a large custom built (LDS) 2-12 cabinet.Subway 1-15 would be a good match
That's the cab I'm looking at. Well actually 2 of them!