How about focussing on groove...feel and time...all of which are far more important skills to develop if you are a beginner/intermediate player and all of which transcend any argument concerning 4 vs 5 stringed electric basses . Are you trying to tell me that cats can groove better on ERBs?? I'm speechless at the thought.
Feel and time come from the player, not the instrument, and are no more relevant to this topic than good posture and fashion sense. Groove has absolutely nothing to do with string count; you either have it or you don't.
And needlessly shifting up and down the finger board'?? what you construe as needlessly shifting, I construe as the opportunity to continually develop a knowledge of the board which is second to none. In fact I choose not to play a 5 for that very reason...is that wrong??
So, you're suggesting that having a full two octaves under your fingers at all times
inhibits a player's knowledge of the fingerboard?
Shifting up and down the board should be an option rather than a necessity.
The four string bass is not obsolete. Far from it and perfectly adequate for 99% of bass players out there...especially jazz and rock players.
If four-string basses are "perfectly adequate" for 99% of the players out there, why are fives enjoying the tremendous popularity that the various TB polls suggest? Some of the top luthiers like Mike Tobias and George Furlanetto seldom build fours anymore. The limited-range five and full-range six are their bread and butter.
A four string bass serves the music...you just have to know how to play it.
And a five-string bass serves the music even better by increasing the instrument's range and playability, which opens up more options for musical expression. You just have to know how to play it.
Finally ....as a four string, old school player who plays mostly jazz on bass, (but also most other mainstream styles)...id like to say that I've never turned my back on the instrument's evolution and welcome players taking it in new directions. I love guys like Anthony jackson.The fact that i eschew ERBs personally, does not make me stubborn; I'm just very content to lay down a good groove on 4. I derive great satisfaction from it. An ERB would be of no advantage to me in my pursuit of the musical goals I have set for myself (which are considerable).
How did ERBs (seven or more strings) get dragged into this?
We all pick the limitations we're willing to live with: You get what you settle for. I haven't owned a four-string in over twenty five years, and for me, settling for such an outdated instrument would be like losing a finger on my left hand.
IMO, a beginner should start with the best tool at their disposal, and the best tool is the one that offers fewer limitations. Thankfully, the EBG has evolved in the last half-century. If you learn on the truncated-range basses of the past, you'll be hobbled at the starting gate.