TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I prefer the active, but also use passive depending on the song.
Pressurewounds are my favorite strings. If I didn't have them on several of my basses, I'd probably put them on the TRBX also.
I'm still waiting to play it with the band to see if the flats will stay on.
Ok, thanks. I was just curious...
I love the Precision Flats on my passive 4-string P bass, but I'm not sure if I would ever want flats on my 505 as I feel it needs something with a wider frequency spectrum (= roundwound) in order to get the most out of the active EQ. P bass for "old school" and 505 for "modern".
Please report back. I'd be very curious to know how a set of flats would work on this bass - specifically how they sit in the mix with a live band.
"It's easier to tame a lion than teach a pussy cat to roar".
My BTB is really stellar for that but I want to work the TRBX and my Fender Jazz 5 into the mix.
Well put.
What strings are you using on your BTB and Fender?
I think you've got your 505 categorized correctly. I'm guessing flats won't do anything for it. I'm also of a mind that if you've got too much punch or too much crunch you can always dial it back, but if it's not there you're not going to manufacture it. It's ike the old saying "It's easier to tame a lion than teach a pussy cat to roar".
The flats stay on for now. They thicken up the tone and remove some of the high end, which is what I was after. There is just enough shimmer in the strings and more than enough tone control on this bass to do modern stuff. The flats sounded great last night at rehearsal with the band. If I decide that I need more high end later, I will experiment with Fender light flats.Please report back. I'd be very curious to know how a set of flats would work on this bass - specifically how they sit in the mix with a live band.
The flats stay on for now. They thicken up the tone and remove some of the high end, which is what I was after. There is just enough shimmer in the strings and more than enough tone control on this bass to do modern stuff. The flats sounded great last night at rehearsal with the band. If I decide that I need more high end later, I will experiment with Fender light flats.
The flats stay on for now. They thicken up the tone and remove some of the high end, which is what I was after. There is just enough shimmer in the strings and more than enough tone control on this bass to do modern stuff. The flats sounded great last night at rehearsal with the band. If I decide that I need more high end later, I will experiment with Fender light flats.
Which flats specifically?
I'm experimenting with GHS precision flatwounds, light set, on my trbx504.
I happened to have a set of the GHS precision flats, half broken in, ready to put on there. Otherwise I would have tried Fender 9050L's. I'm going to wait out the break in period with the GHS strings before I decide. But I personally really like the way they sound on there right now.Which flats specifically? What amp are you running through? I might like to experiment with them, if for no other reason just to see for myself. So far my 605 likes every string set I've tried... except the stock set (go figure). Just every one is different. I'm surprised how good it sounds with LaBella stainless rounds. My Jazz 5 didn't like the LaBella SS at all.
Meanwhile, I'll continue on with my string quest for the 505 as I'm really looking forward to trying out the GHS Progressives, which use the same nickel-iron alloy as the Pressurewound but in a roundwound package for a brighter and more aggressive tone. My hope is they can bring the best out of my Yamaha by liven it up a bit.
Good to hear, I have on Dunlop Super Brights, and they are stringers that fall on the more flexible side, lower tension, they feel good, and they have clarity, especially in the highs and lows (I have the steels). They also don't feel rough as you might think most SS strings feel. I use to be a nickel guy, but I'll stick to steels from now on. I have the 45-125 set tuned to Bb standard. They still feel great at standard tuning too. I'll give the Progressives in my next string change, I've been wanting to try exposed cores on the B's and E's, and I do like the tone of alloy wrapped strings.I was just re-reading all the posts I made in this thread, and figured a quick update is in order...
My tone quest for my Yamaha TRBX505 came to an end when I installed the GHS Progressives (40-60-80-100-130) three days ago.
One particular feature that kept me from trying these strings until now is the exposed core on B and E. Ironically, that's exactly what turned out to be the game-changer for me. All of a sudden, my Yamaha speaks with clarity and confidence as if it just woke up from a slumber, thanks to the Alloy 52 and its responsiveness, and the low B has never sounded as good on this bass as it does now. The "modern active tone" I've been hearing in my head for the last 15 mths is finally here.
![]()
![]()
GHS Progressives (40-60-80-100-130)
Are you sure you don't have 45-130's? I didn't see 40-130 on GHS' site.
BASS PROGRESSIVES™