And of course, they have to have the "ear" for it before either the training or the technology.
Yeah unfortunately I might have to deal with someone tonight who has the training, technology but no ear.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And of course, they have to have the "ear" for it before either the training or the technology.
There's def something to be said for proper training vs technology.
Would a clean boost between the preamp and DI work? If so, I could just toss it in the gig bag when I use other amps.
They are a godsend, believe you me. One of those digital boards will replace a good 2-3 large racks worth of EQ's and other effects. And on a lot of the shows I do, we have several singers come on and off and they all need different things, so it's really great to be able to punch up everyone's settings within a second. Of course, that doesn't mean you don't need to tweak it once it's set, and it's no excuse for not being able to move a fader.Agreed
I never seen any of these preprogrammable baords because I would never endorse one.
You got it! Yes, it's a church. I should've chimed in earlier, but it's been a busy day. The guys are volunteers, so no one is getting paid. I can understand why they're a little gun shy in boosting because we've had issues in the past where the overall levels were WAY too loud. We brought the pro in, and he set everything for an automatic configuration. We have to pay him each time he comes in, so we don't want to do that every time I change amps/DI's. I've got a couple of amps I would like to use until I figure out which one works best in that environment which is why I made the original post.
I run wireless sometimes which is how I know amp #2 isn't as loud as the Tone Hammer. I'm just looking for a way to boost amp #2, #3, or whatever to the same levels without bringing the pro in and without freaking out the volunteers.
On the plus side, people tell us we sound better every week.They are a godsend, believe you me. One of those digital boards will replace a good 2-3 large racks worth of EQ's and other effects. And on a lot of the shows I do, we have several singers come on and off and they all need different things, so it's really great to be able to punch up everyone's settings within a second. Of course, that doesn't mean you don't need to tweak it once it's set, and it's no excuse for not being able to move a fader.
......The problem is that in doing so, I lose tonal flexibility. The EQ on the board is currently set flat. Since I'm more knowledgeable on EQ'ing bass, I usually EQ on the amp, and run my wireless unit during sound check to figure out what sounds good.
The problem is the operator doesn't know what he is doing. I would assume some one came in and set the board for the room as far as EQ goes. That doesn't mean you can't adjust levels and EQs for the instruments and mics. If you know what you are doing digital boards are the way to go but there is a learning curve. My band was the back-up band for the Colgate country showdown and the soundman was using a yamaha digital board for monitors. It made his job much easier because he was dealing with a dozen different singers. During sound check he would get the monitor level set for each singer, assign them a number and then was able to re-call the scene at showtime by pushing a button or two.To each is own. There is no right or wrong way to do this. I see two issues with this. Gain structure, if volumes of the instruments are different then when the board was programmed, the gain structure will be incorrect on the channels. Each room requires different volume levels. My second issue is channel EQ, each rooom has different characteristics which require some EQ'ing from the sound guy. I like control and access to individual channel EQ, what if the board was programmed in the studio and you played an outside gig? Am I wrong in my assumptions?