I have been wondering why more common time signatures (2/2, 3/4, 4/4, 6/8) seem to please my American/European-trained taste in music, than the somewhat "unnerving" odd time signatures (5/4; 7/8 and the like)?
Perhaps they feel strange when they violate those well-learned expectancies (of regular rhytms) or when grouping is ambiguous.
When grouped clearly and learned (in time) through exposure and movement, they eventually become as natural as any other meter.
Is it fair to say that cultural heritage has a lot to do with it?
Perhaps someone here who has been exposed or is a practicioner of music sound therapy may be able to offer some insight into this.
Or you may want to comment on pieces you've written in odd meters and the challanges it faced from the players and the audience alike.
Regards to all
Perhaps they feel strange when they violate those well-learned expectancies (of regular rhytms) or when grouping is ambiguous.
When grouped clearly and learned (in time) through exposure and movement, they eventually become as natural as any other meter.
Is it fair to say that cultural heritage has a lot to do with it?
Perhaps someone here who has been exposed or is a practicioner of music sound therapy may be able to offer some insight into this.
Or you may want to comment on pieces you've written in odd meters and the challanges it faced from the players and the audience alike.
Regards to all