• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Odd time signatures rhytms

I have been wondering why more common time signatures (2/2, 3/4, 4/4, 6/8) seem to please my American/European-trained taste in music, than the somewhat "unnerving" odd time signatures (5/4; 7/8 and the like)?

Perhaps they feel strange when they violate those well-learned expectancies (of regular rhytms) or when grouping is ambiguous.
When grouped clearly and learned (in time) through exposure and movement, they eventually become as natural as any other meter.

Is it fair to say that cultural heritage has a lot to do with it?

Perhaps someone here who has been exposed or is a practicioner of music sound therapy may be able to offer some insight into this.
Or you may want to comment on pieces you've written in odd meters and the challanges it faced from the players and the audience alike.

Regards to all
 
My primarily bluegrass'ish band has recently done a couple of Christmas songs in 5/4... We Three Kings, Drummer Boy, etc., songs that lent themselves to a little tweaking. I was on banjo, so I cannot speak directly to the experience on DB, but we just arranged and worked them up in 5/4 because it was fun -- in fact this whole thing was suggested by our band's double bassist (who I admire greatly). There were no real cultural reasons behind doing this, but it was a challenge and doing a few songs in 5/4 gave us some background for arranging some other songs that way in the future.
 
For some reason I love odd time signatures. This is in spite of me growing up playing standard time sigs in the orchestra for decades. Sure, we played "Appalachian Spring" and "The Rite of Spring" and other pieces with changing time signatures in college, but for the most part, it was 4/4, 3/4, or 6/8. Those odd rhythms just speak to me, though.
 
It’s all cultural context. For us, 4/4, 2/4, and 3/4 are what we are familiar with and have established dance cultures around. But also, we in the west have tried to intellectualize snd externalize rhythm. It’s something you have to calculate rather than feel.

Now if you go to the Balkans for example, they play in what we consider to be odd meters but they don’t think of it that way. For them it’s groupings of 2 and 3, or short and long beats for dancing. Check out this insane video of Ivo Papasov playing and try to count along with the meter changes and modulations (hint it’s next to impossible). To our ears and aesthetic preferences, this sounds like absolute chaos. But if you go to a wedding in Bulgaria for example, everyone will be dancing along!



This thread is also reminding of a great lesson on rhythm during my time at CalArts. I was taking a class on Tala (Hindustani rhythmic solfège) and Pandit Swapan Chaudhuri was in town and teaching the class. We were still focusing on Tin Tal (a 16 beat rhythmic cycle) and having us work on modulating to different speeds in the cycle so that it resolves on beat 1. He challenged us figure out where we had to modulate to 1.5 speed and I vividly remember all of us trying to do the math in our heads to figure it out. One grad student was super confident he figured it out and Swapan had him demonstrate. As soon as he started he realized he was wrong and Swapan was laughing. He then perfectly executed the task without a second thought proceeded to tell us that he doesn’t believe in math. He justified it by telling us if we think of these calculations in our head while performing, we stop being present with the music and most importantly aren’t feeling anything. Lesson learned.