• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Official Barefaced Bass Cab Club

If I order one to the states are there any costs besides what's listed on the barefaced site?

Any converts from bag end to bareface?

The price includes shipping. If they send USPS then there isn't usually another charge (how my SC came). If they use FedEx you will get hit for a customs import tax. It isn't a huge amount but it isn't free. I think it was around $50 on my SM. FedEx sends that bill.
 
Update, on my Retro 610.
A lot of statements about the "mid hump" in comparison to the NV610. I see that also with my experience, but I think its not a less mid thing, its that the Retro has more low end going on, which changes the "focus or perception" of the mid outputs. This cab still cuts through in loud settings, it just does it with more GIRTH.
My issue is I love this cab and its ability to get my tones. Every BL I've worked with in the last 3weeks wants me to bring a smaller cab. Frustrating.....
I may have to entertain the 210 cab in multiples. If anyone has a need (and good use)for the Retro PM me, I may sell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: monsterthompson
Yeah. I've said the Super Compact can sound a little boxy at low volumes, but it probably has as much to do with what I'm not hearing out of the treble since it has no tweeter, and the low end it produces. After break in and st volume it sounds great in the mix. No static and I compared my SC to his Hathor 1203 when I first got the SC and there was a difference. I now have a 1203 in my hands and they are more alike than I thought based on that prior head to head.
 
Update, on my Retro 610.
A lot of statements about the "mid hump" in comparison to the NV610. I see that also with my experience, but I think its not a less mid thing, its that the Retro has more low end going on, which changes the "focus or perception" of the mid outputs. This cab still cuts through in loud settings, it just does it with more GIRTH.

I have to disagree, the mids in the RetroSix10 are definitely less pronounced than in the NV610, and not just in perception because of the extended lows in the R610. I have both cabs sitting side by side and have done a lot of comparing and experimenting.

It doesn't make one cab better than the other but it helps to know what you will get when you choose either. I personally love the pronounced mids in the NV610 but I know a lot of people who would prefer the lesser hump/closer-but-not-quite-flat mid response in the R610. You get more mids in the NV610 but more highs and lows in the R610. Run the two cabs together and every day is Christmas. :)
But imo both cabs deserve credit for where their strengths are.

Also, it cannot be overstated how fantastic the weight of/moving the R610 is. The NV610 isn't very heavy for a big cab, but the R610 is unnaturally light and until you get to move a 610 cab up or down a flight of stairs in one hand you'll never appreciate how masterfully balanced this cab is in portability, tone and output.
 
  • Like
Reactions: monsterthompson
Had a chance to take my Super Compact out on Saturday along with a Hathor 1203.

At home, the 1203 and the SC played well together and I expected them to pair well at full volume. The first time I paired them was when I first got the SC and nostatic and I met up for a gear comparison. His 1203 didn't pair well. I don't know if there has been SC break-in or if Duke altered the 1203 formula on newer models.

I played with my usual crew of old band mates. Drums, vox, keys through the PA, and a Line 6 212 guitar combo. Indie rock, 90's ish material with some metal and punk influences at times. We get stupid loud and the guitar is usually uncompressed and big. The keys sometimes have big, bass heavy patches. Drummer/vox is unrestrained and hits hard. We aren't bad, but we are unrefined.

I started plugging my P bass into my Tonehammer pedal into the power section of a Genz Shuttle 9.0. I got to the rehearsal space early so I could experiment. Plugging into just the 1203 I got a nice tone. It wasn't terribly loud nor bassy, but it was in line with my expectations. I figured I'd need both cabs to keep up based on prior experience in this setting.

Next, I tried the SC solo at the same settings; I just swapped the power amp speaker cable. At the same settings, the SC was noticeably louder and the low frequencies dwarfed what the 1203 had put out. I had previously tried the SC with a a Super Midget and briefly tried them each solo. Based on my memory, the Hathor was closer to the SMidget in terms of lows and volume, for what my memory is worth.

Once the rest of the band arrived, I tried pushing the first hour with just the SC, and it worked like a charm. Great tone. Plenty of lows. Shocking volume from a 112 cab weighing less than 25lbs. The tone was great. It took EQ well, and pushing my AGS, Agro, and/or Blower Box pedals didn't make it flinch. At one point, the limit light on the amp went on when I had the Blower on with a healthy bass boost. A quick EQ adjustment and all was well.

I honestly expected a 112 cab to have a hard time keeping up with this group based on having played a variety of amp and cab combos with these guys over the years. The Super Midget solo couldn't do it the last time I played with them. This time the SC held up for 3 hours of bashing, all alone and without a complaint. I'm quite impressed.

I think I've got a legit 1-cab solution. The Hathor and/or Super Midget seems to be a luxury. They could help in even louder settings, but since they are so similar I think having both of them might not make sense. The Hathor does seem to do a better job of polite, HiFi sounds with my gear, but that isn't really my goal so I haven't toyed with it much. Though going right into the Genz and bypassing the Tonehammer will get me near there with the SM.

I'm a pretty GAS-y guy, but I'm having hard time imagining wanting or needing another cab at this point. I can see how the a Super Twin would be a total monster. If I was gigging in a louder band, that cab might make sense.
 
Last edited:
Andrew, try your Six10 with the hybrid resonator port plugged (rolled up T-shirt ideal). I'd be interested in how that changes the lows vs the NV610 - do they end up about equal in loudness (so same LF sensitivity)?

Mr Thompson, I'm glad my original advice of the Super Compact being the best choice was correct!
 
  • Like
Reactions: monsterthompson
Really considering a Super Compact for small gigs.

I'm getting back into playing after a long absence (birth of son 6 years ago) and am looking for something smaller than my SWR Henry 8x8, which I have humped in and out of many, many clubs. However, I'm more particular about good tone than I used to be, and it looks like the Barefaced stuff is top-notch in this regard. Am also considering Phil Jones and Glockenklang cabs as well.

Looking forward (no, really) to reading this whole thread. Thanks to all who have contributed.
 
Sorry man, I need to fill out my profile -- unlike in other forums, it really is helpful to have that stuff listed.

Basses: Lakland 55-94 (5), Warwick FNA (5), Fender Geddy Lee Jazz (4), Seuf P-Bass (4), Carvin LB70 (4), mutt fretless jazz (4).
Amps: SWR SM-400s, Eden WT-600, and am thinking about a good tube head (i.e. Reeves Custom 225, Schroeder Dozer)
 
  • Like
Reactions: monsterthompson