"Oh. I have four Fenders, but I prefer to take something better to gigs." That should shut them up.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
"Oh. I have four Fenders, but I prefer to take something better to gigs." That should shut them up.
Moral of this story is that if we didn't have a billion companies copying fender, it never would've happened.
I don't get how they can copy a body shape and sound while car manufacturers, for example, can't. E.g. Ford couldn't put out a car with an Enzo Ferrari body made from steel and powered by a 4 cylinder, so how can SX (among others) get away with making a bass with a precision body made from ply and lower grade electrics?

Yeah it happens man, heaven forbid if you took a Squier onstage!!
I've not really ever encountered Fender snobbery, but I have had lots of people ask about my Sadowsky NYC and act like its an unknown brand with a funny name...

I can't understand people who would come up to someone and run down their choice of instrument. It's never happened to me at a gig, but one time when I was in a music store with my Spector Euro one of the workers said "Oh, that thing's a blatant Warwick rip-off". Not many people over here would be familiar with Spectors, but Warwicks are very popular so I guess the guy assumed that my bass was some sort of copy, I'd imagine this is the case with the guys knocking Sadowskys, Laklands etc
Totally +1 on that!After about 30 years of playing I have decided I clearly dislike being known and identified more for what tool I play on than my playing itself.
As a father of newborn twins...
Wow, congratulations! Or should I say "good job"...? 
didn't warwick buy the design of the rebop off spector and call it a streamer?