Yeah, right. OK pal, you go make it big for all of us. It's that easy.
Hey, you're the one who said that any big name band has no musical integrity! Big claim mate!!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yeah, right. OK pal, you go make it big for all of us. It's that easy.
+1.
Rick Rubin takes a Zen approach. He sits back, takes it all in and helps the band to make the best record they can make - to make them more them. He doesn't force bands into his mold, he brings out what's in THEM. That's why Chili Peppers to Slayer to Beastie Boys to Weezer don't sound anything alike.
Rubin is an encourager and a catalyst. He hangs out with the band, snoops around and gets to know them. A lot of us have heard the story of Under The Bridge. That was a poem in one of Keidis's notebooks that Rubin read and said "that's a song". Keidis said "No, it's just a poem. It doesn't fit the Chili Peppers." but Rubin persisted and encouraged and it became something totally new and cool for them and their biggest hit. For Blood Sugar he encouraged Flea to cool the slapping because at that time it was limiting them. Flea credited Rubin for that. It wasn't compromising his integrity - it was breaking a habit, avoiding a trap and trying something new. After say Mothers Milk, what was Flea going to prove or establish for the Peppers by continued, massive amounts of slapping? Rubin helped bring out a whole compositional side from them that hadn't surfaced until then.
Compromising isn't necessarily surrendering integrity - it can be listening, having an open mind, cooperating and recognizing new possibilities. I mean being in a band is a compromise but there are many bands that I believe never fundamentally compromised their art. A lot of times a band changes and people think it's compromise but it's often a matter of a phase playing out and them moving on.


+1.
Rick Rubin takes a Zen approach. He sits back, takes it all in and helps the band to make the best record they can make - to make them more them. He doesn't force bands into his mold, he brings out what's in THEM. That's why Chili Peppers to Slayer to Beastie Boys to Weezer don't sound anything alike.
Rubin is an encourager and a catalyst. He hangs out with the band, snoops around and gets to know them. A lot of us have heard the story of Under The Bridge. That was a poem in one of Keidis's notebooks that Rubin read and said "that's a song". Keidis said "No, it's just a poem. It doesn't fit the Chili Peppers." but Rubin persisted and encouraged and it became something totally new and cool for them and their biggest hit. For Blood Sugar he encouraged Flea to cool the slapping because at that time it was limiting them. Flea credited Rubin for that. It wasn't compromising his integrity - it was breaking a habit, avoiding a trap and trying something new. After say Mothers Milk, what was Flea going to prove or establish for the Peppers by continued, massive amounts of slapping? Rubin helped bring out a whole compositional side from them that hadn't surfaced until then.
Compromising isn't necessarily surrendering integrity - it can be listening, having an open mind, cooperating and recognizing new possibilities. I mean being in a band is a compromise but there are many bands that I believe never fundamentally compromised their art. A lot of times a band changes and people think it's compromise but it's often a matter of a phase playing out and them moving on.
Listen here buddy!!!I've been called a lot of things, but NEVER has anyone called me a... oh.... nevermind!
![]()

Quote me on how you could interpret that from anything I posted, please :scowl:And anyone making a CD or a recording or playing a gig where you get paid any money (including bsuking) must be selling out, of course![]()
I'm not saying that. I'm saying that every band that you see on TV and hear on the radio (or for that matter, tried to get a gig at their local music hall or drinking establishment) has done things with their music that they didn't want to do in the name of making money. One likes to believe in the freedom of music, but glittering prizes and endless compromises shatter the illusion of integrity.Hey, you're the one who said that any big name band has no musical integrity! Big claim mate!!
Maybe this says more about me than him but I had to loop those triplet riffs in Detroit Rock City for 3 hours straght gradually building speed before I got them right. Now that I actually tore some of his stuff apart I have more respect for him. Same with Duff McKegan (sp?)
I'm not saying that. I'm saying that every band that you see on TV and hear on the radio (or for that matter, tried to get a gig at their local music hall or drinking establishment) has done things with their music that they didn't want to do in the name of making money. One likes to believe in the freedom of music, but glittering prizes and endless compromises shatter the illusion of integrity.
So you don't think they have to kiss a lot of butts to get their albums in stores and book gigs where they can sell albums after the gig? Or to get the money it takes to record an album? Or to get people to buy them? Seriously, you can't be that naive.Mate, you're going by your experience and knowledge of the music industry, and I from mine. If kissing arse is the way you do things, then all the more power to you.
What's your take on independent artists who have made it big? How and where's their compromise when they don't have a record company to answer to, who manage themselves?