It ain't an amp, but it will amaze you through whatever class D amp you want!
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Lol...
I've played SVT-3s which sound nice but do have documented issues with the PCB. Didn't feel like gambling when you can get a hand wired tube pre-amp section. Way I see it is the 500D is the best hybrid amp Ampeg never made.

I loved my WA, but on a whim decided to dive into all tube amps, starting with the Fender Super Bassman (before eventually switching over to the SVT). I remember the first time I A/Bed those heads with the WA and was blown away by how dramatic the difference was.
Instead of flipping a bunch of heads and cabs, you might be better off buying a semi-parametric EQ like the Tech 21 Q strip or Empress ParaEQ.
I do agree that a lot of the sound that people associate with the SVT is actually the 810. When you combine a bunch of drivers you get mutual coupling in the low end and destructive interference at higher frequencies. So the sound of one 10" speaker versus eight will be a bit different. You can use a bit of EQ to emulate the build up in the low end and high frequency roll off of an 810. As you probably know, the SVT does not go super deep either, so an adjustable HPF may help.
The other aspect is the SVT has a slight, broad-band boost centered around 400hz and gets a bit grindy when pushed. I think the grind is a bit of distortion that occurs in the mids and upper mids. Several Ampeg amps are good at reproducing the grind and some of them are even Class D. The only one I have experience with is the SVT8-Pro which is pretty rare. I am sure @JimmyM can steer you in the direction on which current models are the best and most portable.
Although I have not played one. The Mesa WD800 has a tube preamp and a flexible enough semi-parametric EQ with an adjustable HPF that you should be able to coax some SVT like tones out of it.
I just felt the all tube heads sounded fatter, more round and more open than the WA. I also liked the way they respond to dynamics and how they sound when pushed. I really liked the Fender, but it was a lot of knob twisting whereas the SVT was more "set and forget", which is why it went. It is lighter and more flexible though - and when I got it dialed in, the tone was glorious!What did you feel the difference was? I've been using SVT's for years and will keep on using them but I also like Fender tube amps and was considering picking one up although I need another head like I need another hole in my head.
I just felt the all tube heads sounded fatter, more round and more open than the WA. I also liked the way they respond to dynamics and how they sound when pushed. I really liked the Fender, but it was a lot of knob twisting whereas the SVT was more "set and forget", which is why it went. It is lighter and more flexible though.
Lol...
I'm not sure what a WA is, I meant the Super Bassman and you just answered me, thanks. I've heard they were a little more complicated than SVT's.
The SVT 7 sounds close IMHO.
Admittedly I've never played an SVT but here's my take. To me bigger speakers with tweeters aren't the same as a fridge sound. I use a Barefaced 2x10". It has the same frequency range if not broader than an Fridge. I use a New Vintage Undertow 500D which has an all tube pre-amp and a Broughton Power Stage to mimic a tube power section. The new Mesa Hybrid Amp with that power section response control probably gets close to an SVT too I'd imagine.
My question would be which amp do I prefer to play through. I've used SVT + 810 rigs (I liked them) but my current Aguilar ticks more boxes than an SVT.
I don't think there's any benefit in buying one amp and hoping it sounds like another.