TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I agree. I've been hearing stories like this as long as I can remember (and I'm 46). I think it partly represents a generational bias from the person asking the question. Pat Buchanan's generation is shocked that today's kids don't know much about WWII or the Korean war. OK, that's a shame. But how many people of Pat's generation know how to send a text message or operate an ipod?To tell the truth, panicky articles about how the school kids are failing to learn are pretty routine... and have been for decades
But how many people of Pat's generation know how to send a text message or operate an ipod?
I know it's apples to oranges. That's the point. When someone says "kids today don't know anything", what they really mean is "kids today don't know the things I consider important". That is partly because kids today consider different things important. Use of technology is an important skill in 2011. If you can't copy and paste text from a Word document to an e-mail, or search for something using Google, you are missing an important skill. What percentage of people Pat's age can do those things? What's more likely to come up in an interview for an entry level job - computer skills or 20th century history?Apples to oranges.
Agreed.I love how it all comes down to a class warfare problem.
Problem is, especially in America, kids are no longer taught how to think, they haven't been in quite some time. They are taught what to think. Standardized tests in attempts to bring equity amongst the "castes" and "classes" have done nothing but ruined learning. Kids are taught what to think to prepare for tests, and no longer taught how to think and use their brain. You end up with a bunch of zombies regurgitating someone else's thoughts about someone else, about someone else, instead of them actually thinking about the subject matter.
Frankly, I don't give a crap what people know about this or that, they should know how to think in whatever field they choose. Now we just have a bunch of insufferable know-it-alls who know little about all, and all about nothing.
End Rant. (a lot of tongue-in-cheek)
Agreed.
I've taught for 15 years- in one of the lowest income school districts in California, in one of the best prep schools in NZ and now in a very good school district in CA. The 'problems' are the same no matter where you go in the western world.
Just my opinion, but the assumption that every single student wants to go to college is asinine. The NCLB laws here are ridiculous and as a result, we're seeing a generation of students who would have become skilled workers (plumbers, carpenters, mechanics, etc) sit on their asses in class until they're 18- taking classes that they may not be interested in and which will have little to no impact on what they actually want to do with their lives. Not to say that everyone who goes into skilled labor does poorly in school, but there are a ton of kids who sit in classrooms and get very, very little out of what's being taught.
I always tell my classes that the 'stuff' you learn in school is not really all that important- school is for learning how to learn. Stretch your brain in new directions, learn how to think in ways that you're not good at on your own. It's like the basketball player who is a great athlete, but a horrible shooter and ball handler. He'll be a better ball player by practicing the things that don't come naturally- rather than spend time polishing his dunks.
tbrannon said:Agreed.
I've taught for 15 years- in one of the lowest income school districts in California, in one of the best prep schools in NZ and now in a very good school district in CA. The 'problems' are the same no matter where you go in the western world.
Just my opinion, but the assumption that every single student wants to go to college is asinine. The NCLB laws here are ridiculous and as a result, we're seeing a generation of students who would have become skilled workers (plumbers, carpenters, mechanics, etc) sit on their asses in class until they're 18- taking classes that they may not be interested in and which will have little to no impact on what they actually want to do with their lives. Not to say that everyone who goes into skilled labor does poorly in school, but there are a ton of kids who sit in classrooms and get very, very little out of what's being taught.
I always tell my classes that the 'stuff' you learn in school is not really all that important- school is for learning how to learn. Stretch your brain in new directions, learn how to think in ways that you're not good at on your own. It's like the basketball player who is a great athlete, but a horrible shooter and ball handler. He'll be a better ball player by practicing the things that don't come naturally- rather than spend time polishing his dunks.
So kids are confused about history, eh? Is there any wonder? We can't even collectively decide how to properly tell the story of our nation's history. No one is ever satisfied, someone is always offended, there are so many perspectives from which our history can be told. School districts keep playing loose and fast with the formats, and kids ultimately walk away confused.
And guess what? The same thing is happening in other core disciplines. The ideologues are constantly at odds as to how things should be taught, and even what should be taught. Our public shools are nothing more than one long laboratory experiment that keeps getting further and futher from the desired result.
I blame government interference, public school boards, and public school administrators for lack of guts, focus, and direction. This is why I took an early retirement from public education. It's a mess, and it's getting messier every year. I still have two kids in public high school, and I'm starting to feel like a bad parent for not providing them a better opportunity for a primary education.
So kids are confused about history, eh? Is there any wonder? We can't even collectively decide how to properly tell the story of our nation's history. No one is ever satisfied, someone is always offended, there are so many perspectives from which our history can be told. School districts keep playing loose and fast with the formats, and kids ultimately walk away confused.
I blame government interference, public school boards, and public school administrators for lack of guts, focus, and direction.
As far as history goes - that is probably exactly what folks should learn from it.
Both of these pretty much sum it up for me. I've been teaching for ten years now and I'm seeing an alarming focus on pushing kids toward test taking skills, and regurgitating data related to the test like good little robots. The majority of my students come from low income households with a lot of people living in close proximity to each other with a tv on in every room. They don't read, don't know how to read (at grade level), yet reading at school (or at least the meditative process of reading silently to yourself in which you mentally imagine the story or characters) has been eliminated from my curriculum. If I decided to implement it, and my principal walked in, she'd pull me into her office to ask why I was doing it. District wide, the novel has been eliminated from the curriculum for 7th and 8th grade, in favor of smaller, easier-to-digest, watered-down excerpts of politically-correct, multi-cultural stories from a text book. I have been very vocal about this. I find it alarming. The response I get back. 'Not everyone is going to be an English major'. While this is true, my response back is 'you don't have to be an English major to enjoy a good story, or to posses the skill to read through the rich literary history of the written word'.
But I can see why they did it. No one reads anymore. It's common to hear grown adults say 'I'm not a reader, or I don't read books' and you get a bunch of people not only nodding their heads in agreement, but accepting this response as almost wise and intelligent. Instead they prefer to watch the same movies over and over again as they're re-released, and then re-re-released in 3-D.
It's not just English, but history too. They don't read historical novels. My students last year read My Brother Sam is Dead. It's about how sides were chosen and families were divided and then united in the midst of the revolutionary war. The discussions that came out of that book my students will remember for the rest of their lives. As well as the essay they wrote where they had to create a thesis and support it, based upon the question 'how do know which side of war is right?'. I had all of my 32 students turn in a paper on that topic. The reason why they liked it? Common response was because it made them think. They were the last students to read a novel in 8th grade. I'm not just concerned about what they're missing, but the inference they get from removing and devaluing reading a novel.
I teach students how to learn and approach problems looking for solutions in both English and Computers. But more and more I'm being pushed away from this in favor of teaching them how to talk about and analyze their test scores. I call it the data kool-aid. It reminds me more and more of 1984, and Farenheight 451 (those are novels kids) and more and more, I'm reminded of the truth in that George Carlin rant.