• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Paul McCartney: How does he rank as a Bass Player?

Sorry OP, but it IS a dumb question. But I'll weigh in anyway:

Dude is awful, never had an original thought in his brain, never came up with any interesting bass lines, always RUINED whatever groove a song had, never did anything more than just copy boring bass lines from music before him, just doubled the bottom note of the rhythm guitar.

So awful he really should have never picked up the instrument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nixdad
It doesn't matter where he ranks, there's no bassist playoff or bassist draft taking place. He plays the bass just the way he needs to. Some people find him to be the greatest ever, some probably think he's a hack.

What does it matter? @51PRI this is only a question you can answer. The rest of us chiming in is just a subjective take on Sir Paul's playing.

Let me know when the official rankings come out and how the decision was made to rank these bassists.

It's not like we can rank them according to amount of points scored, yards ran, free throws made, goals scored, how fast the ran the forty.

Maybe it's ranked by amount of notes played.

I know I must rank somewhere around 1,745,682
 
Last edited:
In the stereos of the time (and cars), you never heard the fundamentals of the bass - playing a sustained note wasn't something that was helpful to a tune, as it didn't come across to the listener. Add to that the vibe of what the Beatles were doing (upbeat moving stuff in general), and Paul's style (a lot of movement in the bass line) was perfect for the music they did. Many of the same things can be said about Jamerson - same era, similar approach to the instrument.
 

Latest posts