• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

PEAVEY 80'S AND 90'S AMPLIFICATION

As i mentioned in the welcome message the Peavey MarkIV amp head isnt mentioned in the listing for some unknown reason and it is the very amp I have used for the past 30+ years and still going strong. Picture shows my Peavey MKIV and Peavey 1820 cab. Second pic is when I was checking them out in the 80's for purchase.

View attachment 4658635
View attachment 4658636
That's nostalgic -- I started out with one of those but I had the 2x15 cab. Some time around 86 or so.
 
I didn't see mention of the TKO 115 anywhere in here... So catalog was Post Mark IV and pre TKO 115... You can see the TKO 115 in the back Left - circa 1993 or 1994(ish)
Practice.jpg
 
View attachment 4658686

Someone charged you $1500 for a Mark IV in 1986???!!?!?!!!

That amp retailed for around $499 in 1987. I paid $400 for mine new that Christmas at a local music store.

Talk about getting reemed!!!!!!

Btw...I'm certain the Mark IV was gone after 1987/1988. It disappeared from catalogs right after I bought mine.
Yep..you're right @FFEJY...that $1500 was Australia $ and we always got ripped off here in Australia..I paid $1500AUD for the head and $1300AUD for the Peavey 1820 cab..the whole rig cost me $2800 and over the past 36 years of onstage gigging has never let me down and been worth every dollar. I have never regretted buying it.
 
Last edited:
OP is in Australia. I assume that's the imported price in Aussie dollars.
Correct @ardgedee..I bought the head and cab at Regent Music in Adelaide South Australia in 1986. The salesman had to help me carry the 122lb cab up a narrow flight of steps to the street level to load the cab into my station wagon. He earned his commission that day and sounded like a puffing billy steam train afterwards lollll
 
Those vertical silverbar SS 112 guitar amps are the… worst amps ever. They’re totally worth about $3.50 in mint condition.

If anyone has one or more in poor cosmetic but still highly functional shape collecting dust, I know of a very responsible recycling facility in upstate New York which will pay the shipping for you to send them out to process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Giffro
I could see myself dusting off an old peavey head and dragging it around at some point, but I will never haul one of those cabs or combos ever again, lol.

It's just a slow death hauling that weight around.

On the way to the gig: Grab the handle and heave-er that guy out of back and two hand it to the stage area.

Later that night: Just sitting in the car at home dreading dragging that dead weight across the yard, through the door and into the house before collapsing in bed.
That comment had me laughing @cheapbasslovin..been there so many times before...and when you want a drummer to help you lift the 1820 122lbs cab out of the venue into the car he's nowhere to be found lollll
EDIT..funnily enough my ex Aussie drummer married an American girl and is now living in Portland Or. He obviously moved as far away from me and my heavy Peavey gear as possible lollll
 
Last edited:
Aaah yes, the old 80s Peavey bass rig. I had a 1x15 Combo 300, then later I got a Mark VI head (with built in chorus effect!) and an extremely heavy 1820 bass cabinet which consisted of 2 10” and 18” speakers. Black Widow equipped!! That rig never seemed loud enough.
Probably due to the DDT compression limiting the volume and protecting the speakers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mb94952
I've always found it a bit strange that Peavey never gave the direct sales model a shot. It worked pretty well for Carvin for decades, and in my view, Peavey's gear was at least on par with what Carvin built for years, and arguably better...

I'm sure in their 1980s heyday, with their "for musicians on a budget" angle, they were moving a decent amount of gear in the brick n' mortars, but I have to think they were generally lagging behind the more highly-regarded brands. And when they really started to see the writing on the wall - whenever that would have been (late 1990s? 2000s?), you'd think they'd have maybe pivoted to a new business model. Perhaps they'd have even been able to keep building stuff in the USA?

In fact, had Peavey transitioned to a direct sales model, they could/very likely WOULD now be the leader in that segment, given that Carvin is essentially a shadow of what it once was (ie., they don't build a single bass or guitar amplifier anymore).

My first "real" amp was a good ol' Peavey TKO75. I'd love to get my hands on one again, for nostalgia's sake if nothing else...:bassist:
I agree with you @HubbardsFate. I consider my 1991 Peavey Dyna Bass 5 string I bought about that time the very best bass guitar I have owned and I have Rics and EBMM etc. A wonderful sounding well built bass guitar.
Peavey DynaBass 5 and Rumble 500C 115Cab.JPG
 
I agree with you @HubbardsFate. I consider my 1991 Peavey Dyna Bass 5 string I bought about that time the very best bass guitar I have owned and I have Rics and EBMM etc. A wonderful sounding well built bass guitar.
View attachment 4659830
I have a T-40, a redwood Cirrus 6, and a TL-Five. The T-40 probably needs a new neck (came to me that way - eBay purchase), but the Cirrus and the TL-Five are near-flawless, pro-level instruments that I'd put up against pretty much anything...:cool:

Peavey_TL-Five_2.jpg
 
Last edited:
In fact, had Peavey transitioned to a direct sales model, they could/very likely WOULD now be the leader in that segment, given that Carvin is essentially a shadow of what it once was (ie., they don't build a single bass or guitar amplifier anymore).
In the 70s and 80s living in small towns and rural areas meant it was usually hard to get access to Fender and Gibson gear, never mind more esoteric, cult gear from the smaller boutique companies that your guitar heroes were playing. You were going to have to plan a roadtrip to the nearest big city which might be several hours away. But every mom-and-pop music store in the country that sold pianos or band instruments also had Peavey amps.

One of the problems of transitioning to a direct sales system is that you're immediately undercutting your distribution and retail network. If you charge MSRP in order to protect your dealers, the web store might never get off the ground, but if your web store sells at street value prices, your resellers might just decide to drop you before your new platform is self-sustaining since they effectively become nonprofit showrooms on your behalf. Peavey might not have been in a position to be able to take that leap.
 
Peavey made reliable and heavy equipment. But then again, all the eqipment in the 1960-1990's was heavy but not always reliable. I was never ashamed with my peavey gear. I used a Peavy Max (flight case version from 1996) and two 1810 bass cabs to tour with. Played everything from Fenders, Alembics, and Steinberger bass through it. My favorite Peavey head wss the 1990's Sessionbass head. It was 200 watrs of solid state power and sounded the best in overall tone compared to other peavey amps.

Nice to go down "Memory Lane"
 
  • Like
Reactions: mb94952 and Giffro
View attachment 4658686

Someone charged you $1500 for a Mark IV in 1986???!!?!?!!!

That amp retailed for around $499 in 1987. I paid $400 for mine new that Christmas at a local music store.

Talk about getting reemed!!!!!!

Btw...I'm certain the Mark IV was gone after 1987/1988. It disappeared from catalogs right after I bought mine.

I thought the same thing - at first. This is just my take, but I think that the "$" dollar sign has a stray "|" line outside of the "S". You know how some people draw a dollar sign with two vertical lines? but occasionally one of the vertical lines escapes the confines of the S. I think that happened here and TOTALLY makes it look like $1500 instead of the much more reasonable $500. just my two cents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mb94952

Latest posts