I was born in '51. Nuff said.
Difficult indeed is your path, young Jedi.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I was born in '51. Nuff said.
Mine was stolen along with my amps in 1992 from the back of the truck we were loading in to. The T-40 hurt the Aria Pro going at the same time was devastating.
I'd donate my body to science, except they'd probably return it postage due.You're valuable!
I like the idea about the 1st bass. Not my actual 1st bass, it was a semi hollow with 3 strings,no pegheads,a hole where the knobs were covered by plywood and the pickups hold on by nails for good measure. It cost me £1I preferred the weight when I was 17. Now? Not so much![]()
I find it easier to acquire and just as rewarding to seek out a birth decade bass than a birth year bass.
But was is an old AF? as the OP states he is one of....
Never crossed my mind that a birth-year bass meant anything(to me).
If I was invested in doing that, it would have to be an original bass made in the year of my birth. Otherwise, why do it? Philosophically speaking, that is.![]()
I want a birth year bass just because my birth year bass happens to have a really cool set of features.
I am old AF. If I want a birth year bass, I can get one, but it would cost as much as a driveable C4 Corvette. Now, I can also buy a reproduction birth year bass, and I'm sure it's a good instrument...but if I do that, do I need to include "Substitute" by the Who in my set?
Srsly, do you think AVRI will satisfy my itch? I'm kinda dubious (doobie-us?) because I already have many fine instruments so maybe if I'm going to do it, I really have to do it. Let's just say that it really would be $6K or more for a decentish example. What would you do?
Not looking for an overly serious conversation, just shooting the sh with some folks who I respect. Thoughts appreciated, and as always, thanks all.
I also have a 79 T-40 (white) that I feel ever so slightly trumps the 83. As for first basses, I sort of have my Fender Jazz - though the neck is now part of one bass and the body anotherI'm much more inclined to get a "first" bass than a birth year. My first was a '79 T-40. Very good bass but a killer on the back
View attachment 2854731

I think the Camaro came out in 67 and from 70 or so to until just a couple years ago were ugly as all get out, especially with those long pointed noses. I had a 70.If your financial situation is such that you can afford it, and I mean truly afford it, then why the hell not? I'd do it even just for the novelty of it. FWIW I was born in '65. So set me up with a '65 Jazz, custom color w/ matching headstock, dots, binding, and paddle tuners.
While we are at it, I'd take a '65 Vette or a '65 Camaro, just because. If you have the means, go for it. My uncle spent an absurd amount of money on a custom bicycle when he turned 70, because......he could.
I see no reason not to do it.
How did you get a hold of my medical records???What would a birth year bass rather be played by?
A) you
B) A cloned reproduction of you, aged in a lab, made to look like born in the same year as you.

I happened to buy an *almost* birth year bass when I bought my '75 Grabber. (20 years ago)Only one year younger than me so close enough. I do get a bit of joy out of playing something "almost as old as me"
Luckily I have no preconception that i could ever afford something of quality from the era I was born, hence the non-running '79 Jeep Wagoneer in my driveway, that I bought for way less than a bass of your birth year of good enough quality would run....