• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Piano teachers beware. The feds are onto you.

I agree its silly but the author's complaining about Obama and claiming that "this administration" abuses power, cheapens the article. When was the last time an American administration didn't abuse its power?

Why don't the Music Teachers simply ignore the FTC if its true that the FTC has no authority over them?
 

so...in contrast to what aborgman said...they deny wrongdoing and continue to deny it....and they settled the case, essentially, so big brother would not drive them out of business....

and what's this about the government confiscating Indian hardwood that they had...is Indian hardwood legal or not? (seems to be legal, since the gov't is now returning it...)

the gov't just came in and took all their wood and they gave in because they had to....especially since the gov't confiscated legal wood too....although it remains unclear if ANY of the wood they had was ILLEGAL....

and somehow this disproves something in aborgman's mind...well, all i can say is...i hope the gov't doesn't decide to come down on him the same way (and for the same reasons)....if they can do this to a completely law-abiding company like Gibson, they can and will do it to anybody

davesignatureII-1.png


ps-edit- so when you combine this with the subject of this thread, i again postulate that we are at the beginnings of 1984...and i say again, i am glad that i'm old enough that i will probably not be here to see what it comes to in its full flower
 
Why don't the Music Teachers simply ignore the FTC if its true that the FTC has no authority over them?

Obviously you've never had a bureaucrat backed by the power of the federal government develop a hard on for you. Just because they have no legal authority doesn't mean they can't cause you considerable harm.
 
so...in contrast to what aborgman said...they deny wrongdoing and continue to deny it....and they settled the case, essentially, so big brother would not drive them out of business....

Nope.

That is corporate PR.

In 2008, an employee of Gibson participated in a trip to Madagascar, sponsored by a non-profit organization.

Participants on the trip, including the Gibson employee, were told that a law passed in 2006 in Madagascar banned the harvest of ebony and the export of any ebony products that were not in finished form.

They were further told by trip organizers that instrument parts, such as fingerboard blanks, would be considered unfinished and therefore illegal to export under the 2006 law.

Participants also visited the facility of the exporter in Madagascar, from which Gibson’s supplier sourced its Madagascar ebony, and were informed that the wood at the facility was under seizure at that time and could not be moved.

After the Gibson employee returned from Madagascar with this information, he conveyed the information to superiors and others at Gibson.

The information received by the Gibson employee during the June 2008 trip, and sent to company management by the employee and others following the June 2008 trip, was not further investigated or acted upon prior to Gibson continuing to place orders with its supplier.


I suggest folks read the actual non-prosecution agreement.

http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/gibson.pdf