Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Basses [BG]' started by SBassman, Jan 3, 2014.
How should we organize the Micro Bass threads?
I voted for the free for all. Everything in one thread. Plus, I think there is lots of good info to be had in the "crosstalk".
Is this really a problem that needs addressing?
It's not a *problem* - but it would help if we choose the optimum way to organize the information. Lots of people have found the previous dialog enormously helpful, and it makes sense to pause and make sure we are organizing it the right way.
The result of not doing that - is dozens of similar threads, spreading the info out, leading to much less effective dialog.
One thread per instrument is much more organized. Subscribing to the instrument thread(s) of interest makes it easy to keep up. Cross referencing the U-Bass, GT MicroBass, Shortbass 1 and Michael Kelly Sojourn 4 will occur naturally within discussions on those threads anyway.
I prefer one thread per brand to consolidate all the info about that particular brand.
I would merge the GT MicroBass thread back to the UBass Megathread.
If there are too much posts for one thread, I would prefer a split into "instruments" and "strings".
One thread per instrument/brand...keep your chocolate out of my peanut butter!