• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Popular Songs with Odd Time Signatures

LeeNunn

Supporting Member
Oct 9, 2012
1,351
3,509
Charlottesville, VA
I have always been intrigued by the fact that Dave Brubeck's Take Five is so popular given that it's in 5/4. Yesterday I realized the Allman Brothers' Whipping Post alternates between 11/8 and 12/8.

What other popular songs come to mind that are in odd time signatures?
 
"Turn it on Again" by Genesis. I had to check Wikipedia for the time sig:
"The song is also characterised by a rhythmic structure uncharacteristically complex for pop music, with verse/chorus sections in alternating time signatures, 6/4 to 7/4 (13/4), while the intro and bridge sections are in 4/4 and 5/4 (9/4)."

The drummer in my old band always used to get a kick out of people stumbling on the dancefloor to this one. Fun song to play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andruca
Tool's "Schism"

From Wikipedia:

""Schism" is renowned for its use of uncommon time signatures and the frequency of its meter changes. In one analysis of the song, the song alters meter 47 times.[4] The song begins with two bars of 5/4, followed by one bar of 4/4, followed by bars of alternating 5/8 and 7/8, until the first interlude, which consists of alternating bars of 6/8 and 7/8.

The following verse exhibits a similar pattern to the first, alternating bars of 5/8 and 7/8. The next section is bars of 6/4 followed by one bar of 11/8. This takes the song back into alternating 5/8 and 7/8. Another 6/8 and 7/8 section follows, and after this the song goes into repeating 7/8 bars.

The middle section is subsequently introduced, consisting of three bars of 6/8, one bar of 3/8, and one bar of 3/4 repeating several times. At one point it interrupts with two bars of 6/8 followed by a bar of 4/8, twice. A bar of 5/8 is played before the meter switches back to 6/8 for two bars and 2/4 for one bar. This repeats, setting up another section: two bars of 9/8 followed by a bar of 10/8, that pattern again, and then a single bar of 9/8 followed by alternating bars of 6/8 and 7/8. The outro has alternating bars of 5/8 and 7/8, ending with alternating 6/8, 2/8 that one could interpret as pulsing with a 4/4 feel.

The band has referred to the time signature as 6.5/8.[5] Although many composers would use 13/16 instead, 6.5/8 is still a valid fractional time signature."
 
That's a rather charitable use of the word "valid"

Yea :-)

Actually it's not a valid time signature.... valid time signatures must be I'm a common notation length unit on the top part, so a fraction over a fraction (which is what a floating point value is on top as per their claim) is invalid.

Normalization in time signatures is part of basic theory rules. If there is a non integer on top then raise the values in equal proportion until they are both integers, or preferably use a compound time signature.
 
Tool's "Schism"

From Wikipedia:

""Schism" is renowned for its use of uncommon time signatures and the frequency of its meter changes. In one analysis of the song, the song alters meter 47 times.[4] The song begins with two bars of 5/4, followed by one bar of 4/4, followed by bars of alternating 5/8 and 7/8, until the first interlude, which consists of alternating bars of 6/8 and 7/8.

The following verse exhibits a similar pattern to the first, alternating bars of 5/8 and 7/8. The next section is bars of 6/4 followed by one bar of 11/8. This takes the song back into alternating 5/8 and 7/8. Another 6/8 and 7/8 section follows, and after this the song goes into repeating 7/8 bars.

The middle section is subsequently introduced, consisting of three bars of 6/8, one bar of 3/8, and one bar of 3/4 repeating several times. At one point it interrupts with two bars of 6/8 followed by a bar of 4/8, twice. A bar of 5/8 is played before the meter switches back to 6/8 for two bars and 2/4 for one bar. This repeats, setting up another section: two bars of 9/8 followed by a bar of 10/8, that pattern again, and then a single bar of 9/8 followed by alternating bars of 6/8 and 7/8. The outro has alternating bars of 5/8 and 7/8, ending with alternating 6/8, 2/8 that one could interpret as pulsing with a 4/4 feel.

The band has referred to the time signature as 6.5/8.[5] Although many composers would use 13/16 instead, 6.5/8 is still a valid fractional time signature."


Big +1 here. This is but one of the many reasons I'm a devoted Tool fan. They'll build concepts of songs off of time signatures. Lateralus was originally going to be called 987 I believe as it had something to do with it being based off of an ancient mathematical equation. I think I'm saying this right. I don't even have that quite straight myself. And like I said, I'm an avid Tool fan. Just suck at math and details. They are a band that is always pushing timing boundaries with their music and how they write/compose it. I read somewhere that most the time it's not even conscious. Other times it very much is. They have an amazing way of doing things.
 
Big +1 here. This is but one of the many reasons I'm a devoted Tool fan. They'll build concepts of songs off of time signatures. Lateralus was originally going to be called 987 I believe as it had something to do with it being based off of an ancient mathematical equation. I think I'm saying this right. I don't even have that quite straight myself. And like I said, I'm an avid Tool fan. Just suck at math and details. They are a band that is always pushing timing boundaries with their music and how they write/compose it. I read somewhere that most the time it's not even conscious. Other times it very much is. They have an amazing way of doing things.

The vocal pattern counts syllables per line matching a Fibonacci sequence, first counting up then down. Not sure how the time sugnatures fit there as neither 9 nor 7 are Fibonacci numbers. But I don't doubt that they do fit somehow.