Are DI boxes bi-directional? I understand that they are normally used to take a 1/4" output and convert it to XLR for connection to the input of a mixer. Will they also allow me to take an XLR output (e.g. a Mic) and connected it to something that has a 1/4" input (e.g. an amp)?
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
potentially bone-headed question on DI boxes
- Thread starter dancrocker
- Start date
Thanks.
Could you tell me more specifically what I would look for? I assume it's a box that has XLR on one side and 1/4" on the other. But, what is it called?
No box. It'll look something like this.
Or you could get a cord,1/4 in. on one end,XLR on the other.
Or you could get a cord,1/4 in. on one end,XLR on the other.
actually, yes they will. it's just a transformer in a box, and AFAIK a transformer doesn't care which side is driving, it just steps the signal up or down. you'll need an XLR turnaround to get the mic output into the XLR side of the box.
that is not what you want. that's just an adaptor, changing the 3 pins of XLR into the three contacts of TRS 1/4".No box. It'll look something like this.
the one you'd want has a mono 1/4" plug and a longer barrel to put the little transformer in. it's also usually a lo-fi piece of crap, and best avoided. (of course, if you're plugging a mic into a guitar amp fidelity is right out anyway
)
^ If he's just going mic to amp,this will work fine. If he wanted to run a 1/4in to a mixer he'd need the transformer.
Above poster is correct tho,all the options are lo-fi crap ,and best avoided.
well i wouldn't record an album at a $100 an hour studio with one, but they work in a pinch. i've actually used them to record tracks on my little home studio before when i didn't have my mic preamp and had to use a bass amp instead and they work fine.
replies always crack me up - nobody asked about model.
What DI box are you using and do they have anything called "through" or stereo/mono?
Many already have this function included..
OVERALL if you don't (and have spare change - and are a lifer in the gig department), it is good to have a DI that will do this for you vs more cords or conectors.
What DI box are you using and do they have anything called "through" or stereo/mono?
Many already have this function included..
OVERALL if you don't (and have spare change - and are a lifer in the gig department), it is good to have a DI that will do this for you vs more cords or conectors.
Yo can get an XLR to Mono Jack with a Lo -Z to Hi-Z transformer in the case (looks like the pictures above). I have one 'cos my vocal mike is an SM57 (I got it in 1981) which is Lo-Z and so I can plug into any PA system I come across.
A studio I've used a couple times uses DI boxes in reverse all the time to do long cable runs out to amps in the hallway.
Just plug it in backwards, it doesn't really care which way the signal is going. These were passive DI's fwiw.
Just plug it in backwards, it doesn't really care which way the signal is going. These were passive DI's fwiw.
I guess I wasn't quite clear enough, I left out a detail, sorry.
This is done using a PAIR of DI boxes.
so:
Bass 1/4" --> DI, DI XLR --> 2nd DI XLR, 2nd DI 1/4" --> amp.
Make sense?
No, since there'd be an XLR male on each DI box, you'd still need a turnaround, or an XLR cable w/2 female ends (not that there's anything WRONG with that....)
But what does this have to do with what the OP wants to do anyways? I understand you're saying you've used it to transform the signal for long runs, and that the conversion works both ways, but the OP is looking to take a Mic with an XLR out (Male) and go into a 1/4" input. The simplest way is to use an XLR to 1/4" (TS) Imp Transformer.
+1, but it raises the question, "why?"
why does the OP want to put a mic into an instrument amp? the results may be "interesting", but they're never good.
There are a few, hell, even that cheap behringer active one has xlr in's and out's.
Bss has one... Goggle it
Probably not only the simplest, but the 'correct' way.
The issue that's being forgotten here is that the DI sends a low impedance (mic level) balanced signal down its XLR output and a high impedance (guitar level) unbalanced signal down its 1/4" output. To get back to the original question - this implies that dancrocker might be sending a low impedance balanced signal into the amp via its 1/4" input jack (which assumes and expects a high impedance unbalanced signal). The end result is very unpredictable, to say the least.
There are a few, hell, even that cheap behringer active one has xlr in's and out's.
Bss has one... Goggle it
Thanks, I did not know this...
