back to the point of the thread, why would a better make of sub cancel worse than a cheaper one when spread apart? that makes zero sense.
i'd guess a polarity error somewhere, but in that case they'd be even worse when center-clustered, and the OP said they sounded good there.
grasping at straws here, but could there have been different cabling used for the split-out setup vs. the center-cluster, and could one of these other cables have been wired backwards?
we've all heard and used split-apart subs in bars and clubs and such, and it's invariably fine. not as good, but fine. people move around, walking into and out of the various lobes of in-phase low end to where it just sounds like "low end" to them.
also, a big ol' mountain of room gain and reflection usually swamps these kinds of details anyway.
i'd guess a polarity error somewhere, but in that case they'd be even worse when center-clustered, and the OP said they sounded good there.
grasping at straws here, but could there have been different cabling used for the split-out setup vs. the center-cluster, and could one of these other cables have been wired backwards?
we've all heard and used split-apart subs in bars and clubs and such, and it's invariably fine. not as good, but fine. people move around, walking into and out of the various lobes of in-phase low end to where it just sounds like "low end" to them.
also, a big ol' mountain of room gain and reflection usually swamps these kinds of details anyway.
Last edited: