I'm in a bit of a quandary regarding...practice.
My 3-piece band has been around for almost 6 years. Generally, we have maintained a schedule of one, 2 to 3 hour rehearsal per week but when we are getting ready to record (we're an "originals" band) we've often upped that number. When we first started we practiced a bit more frequently than we do now and during that time we wrote much - but not all of the material we still play.
From the start we've been good and tight and have had absolutely no trouble lining up gigs. We haven't made any money but we have played dozens and dozens of shows throughout NYC, including places like The Bitter End and CBGB's before they closed. We have a bunch of gigs lined up for the fall.
We recently found a new drummer who is an upgrade over our previous drummer and is a quick study.
The problem now is that the singer / guitarist is becoming more and more adamant about practicing at least two times a week. He keeps citing these videos he's seen on Nirvana and all these other bands where they talk about practicing endlessly before "making it" and he feels that doubling the number of our practices is the only way we will advance.
I believe the point he is missing is that these bands all formed when the players were all "kids" and most of the people in these bands seemed to have learned their crafts then.
We are all adults. He's almost 40 and I am 50 (our drummer is in his late 20's - we also feature an emcee on a few songs who is in his 40's). I feel that we've long ago done our "apprenticeships" and while there is always room for improvement none of us is going to become dramatically better players, and we are not going to become that much tighter by getting together twice a week.
I feel that he is being unrealistic about the cause and affect of increasing the number of practices. Because he has been bringing this up more and more frequently I also get the feeling that he is framing an argument that scapegoats me as the reason we can't advance.
At the very least I am sensing resentment toward me and I don't know what I can do since I simply do not have the $$ or the time to regularly double the amount of practices we have.
Has anyone else ever encounter a similar situation, and if so does anyone have any suggestions on how I can get my points across?
Thanks.
PS. Sorry for the length of this post...
My 3-piece band has been around for almost 6 years. Generally, we have maintained a schedule of one, 2 to 3 hour rehearsal per week but when we are getting ready to record (we're an "originals" band) we've often upped that number. When we first started we practiced a bit more frequently than we do now and during that time we wrote much - but not all of the material we still play.
From the start we've been good and tight and have had absolutely no trouble lining up gigs. We haven't made any money but we have played dozens and dozens of shows throughout NYC, including places like The Bitter End and CBGB's before they closed. We have a bunch of gigs lined up for the fall.
We recently found a new drummer who is an upgrade over our previous drummer and is a quick study.
The problem now is that the singer / guitarist is becoming more and more adamant about practicing at least two times a week. He keeps citing these videos he's seen on Nirvana and all these other bands where they talk about practicing endlessly before "making it" and he feels that doubling the number of our practices is the only way we will advance.
I believe the point he is missing is that these bands all formed when the players were all "kids" and most of the people in these bands seemed to have learned their crafts then.
We are all adults. He's almost 40 and I am 50 (our drummer is in his late 20's - we also feature an emcee on a few songs who is in his 40's). I feel that we've long ago done our "apprenticeships" and while there is always room for improvement none of us is going to become dramatically better players, and we are not going to become that much tighter by getting together twice a week.
I feel that he is being unrealistic about the cause and affect of increasing the number of practices. Because he has been bringing this up more and more frequently I also get the feeling that he is framing an argument that scapegoats me as the reason we can't advance.
At the very least I am sensing resentment toward me and I don't know what I can do since I simply do not have the $$ or the time to regularly double the amount of practices we have.
Has anyone else ever encounter a similar situation, and if so does anyone have any suggestions on how I can get my points across?
Thanks.
PS. Sorry for the length of this post...