The real question here is tolex or ratfur?Stolen from Reiner Amplification's G+ page:
![]()
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The real question here is tolex or ratfur?Stolen from Reiner Amplification's G+ page:
![]()
Unfortunately, the potential benefit this brings often includes the issue of stored energy in the form of a tank circuit that can interact with class d amps where the PWM carrier oscillates in damped within the zobel correction networks. I have encountered this on several poorly designed (though the designers felt otherwise of course!) speaker products.That can easily be fixed with an LCR on the 2nd spike.
But, most cab designers don't know about these kind of trix...
...stored energy in the form of a tank circuit that can interact with class d amps where the PWM carrier oscillates in damped within the zobel correction networks.
Stolen from Reiner Amplification's G+ page:
![]()
Bottom ported behind the grill solves the critter issue.
I have to take apart my studio near field monitors and check them for stink bugs.
They hide in every place they can find.
Parallel notch filters
Unfortunately, the potential benefit this brings often includes the issue of stored energy in the form of a tank circuit that can interact with class d amps where the PWM carrier oscillates in damped within the zobel correction networks. I have encountered this on several poorly designed (though the designers felt otherwise of course!) speaker products.
The result is amp shutdown in amps that contain appropriate protection, and magic smoke in those that don't.
Never encountered this problem. Maybe the zobel(LCR) was not dimensioned right resulting in a major impedance dip.
You can design a cab to cover a very broad range of frequencies and high power, but if the amp you plug into that cab has no soul, no warmth, no character, then you're trying to make the speaker cabinet compensate for the amp's lack of tone.
Does anyone think that part of the reason sealed "may" be preferred over ported is because many ported cabs have little or no reflection absorbing material inside the cab? I know when I was designing my own cabs they sounded absolutely horrid (no matter how they were EQ'd) without padding inside. I've seen many ported commercial cabs with nothing inside and at best, only very little, if there was any put in there.
Some commercial cab manufacturers skimp on the amount of damping material, but I have never seen a sealed or ported cab with none.
Guitar cabs get away with none as many are open back, plus those guys thrive on distortion and other weird sound artifacts and defects. But there is a trend towards FRFR guitar cabs, so damping material is a part of those designs. Boutique builders use, and the major DIY plans always specify, adequate damping material.
You can design a cab to cover a very broad range of frequencies and high power, but if the amp you plug into that cab has no soul, no warmth, no character, then you're trying to make the speaker cabinet compensate for the amp's lack of tone.
Sometimes in order to provide the perceived necessary correction, the design of the filter suffers from stored energy problems that were either not understood or simply ignored. With a tube amp, this would not be a problem but clearly it can be with other amp topologies.
It's not just minimum impedance, it's the storage of reactive energy. Filter responses contain both capacitive and inductive slopes (leading and lagging current responses), these factors plus stored energy can allow destructive oscillations to occur depending on amp topology and even specific design approaches. They can be especially troublesome on class ab amps using high global feedback and low stability margins, as well as class d topologies.