I’m not pooping on 70’s Fenders…I like them. My issue is perceived value of said instruments for someone who actually would gig them (not a collector). There just isn’t any magic to them IMO. The designs are tried and true, so you have to look at materials and construction. The neck shapes I love, so that’s a positive. The thick poly, the pickups, the iffy bridge alignments, ski jump necks in 69 era, the weight on some with the northern ash…I just don’t see the benefits on a tried and true design compared to an AVRI, an AV2, RI, Nash, etc. Sure, great music was made with them in the 70’s. They were new instruments at that time. Put a new Fender from today in those hands, and it wouldn’t have changed the tones or quality of music.
So now we’re left again with the tried and true P and J design. Is it worth paying 5K for a 74 J or P with the paint, wood, pickups, and iffy construction on some. To some, yes. To me, no way at these prices. I do love the 71-72 era…I think those were the best ones. I would totally be into a P or J from that year range in the $2K-$3K range.
Pre 67? Whole different story IMO. I wish I would have bought the primo 66 P in 2018 I was eyeing and almost pulled the card out for $5200.
Just one man’s opinion that really means nothing other than I have owned a few and can only comment on my experience after looking back at what I’ve owned and bought.