• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Pups and EQ replacements for fretless bass

i just got a used 5 string fretless. it's actually my 1st time to venture into the fretless realm, but i'm already fretting over the current set up of my fretless. so i'm thinking to replace these mighty mite pups (which i'm not getting any good reviews online) and stock eq's with barts m4 soapbars and bart 4.6 a/p eq's. (i saw a spector fretless model with this kind of setup.) would the pups and eq replacements with barts be worth it?

what's the best brand for soapbars and eq's for a fretless bass?

should i go for an all-active set up (both pups and eq's) in a fretless? or should i stick to passive pups w/ active eq's?

:confused::help::confused:
 
i just got a used 5 string fretless.

Congratulations. I have a fretless as well, and I love it. One of the best purchases I've ever made... :cool:

it's actually my 1st time to venture into the fretless realm, but i'm already fretting over the current set up of my fretless.

You're fretting over fretless? No need to do that. The bass is fretless. You should be too... :smug:

so i'm thinking to replace these mighty mite pups (which i'm not getting any good reviews online) and stock eq's with barts m4 soapbars and bart 4.6 a/p eq's. (i saw a spector fretless model with this kind of setup.) would the pups and eq replacements with barts be worth it?

I think so. IMO, it's hard to go wrong with a Bart upgrade. But as to whether you should upgrade, don't be too persuaded by the reviews on the Mighty Mites. As with virtually all things musical, let your ears be your guide... :hmm:

what's the best brand for soapbars and eq's for a fretless bass?

No such thing. It's a matter of personal preference...

should i go for an all-active set up (both pups and eq's) in a fretless? or should i stick to passive pups w/ active eq's?

If you're going for Bart pickups and a Bart preamp, then this decision is already made for you - as all Bart pickups are passive, IIRC. But as to the larger question of active vs. passive, this is also a matter of personal preference. A much better question would be: "What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of active vs. passive?" This allows you to assess the best route to take according to your own particular criteria, whatever those may be - not according to someone else's priorities. :hmm:

As for me, I generally prefer active electronics - if the components are of relatively high quality...

MM
 
I have a bart/bart rig in my Modulus Q5 fretless. I am very happy with it.

I would consider a mid control and pot to be a must. The combination of mid-boost and PU panning is what controls the whole fretless mojo, IMO.

If you want to go all out, try a push-pull mid frequency selector alikened to the Roscoe rig.