TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Vlad'y is an impressive dood in many ways.
*leers pants-ward*
MANY ways.
MEOWROAR.
And yeah Millah, I do have power requirements and geometry (and $cost) down to a fairly precise representation. Not dead on though, but close. It helps with placement a lot! I used to have signal routing drawn in too. But that was just crazy! Hmmm... I just noticed I haven't updated the power distribution... heh.
Great looking board. How do you like the B3K going into the Vintage?
Well, so far I have had very little time to really mess with it. About 20 minutes at home, a quick opening gig and then a rehearsal tonight. I really need some time to sit down and fiddle with the knobs, etc. They are 2 very different pedals. I feel like I need more time to really dial in the sweet spot on the vintage to get just what I'm looking for. However, I really like that they not so similar to be redundant. The Vintage is really more of a "character" pedal in a way, whereas the B3K just adds straight grit to distortion depending on how you set it.
I think it's 41, not 51, right?
Continuing after Midlife Crisis, could be "Over the Hill."
Sum 41?
Vlad'y is an impressive dood in many ways.
*leers pants-ward*
MANY ways.
MEOWROAR.

I've been thinking about picking one up to replace my VT for the tube amp simulation that I get from it. I'm anxious to hear what you think of it.
Finished putting this together today:
![]()
![]()
I'm rather happy with my setup right now![]()