QCS: RMX vs. PLX

[bgavin]

All your computer parts are also made in China. So are Studio Project microphones, Mackie mixers and 7+ billion Chinese... I guess they have the assembly thing down pretty well.

I own (3) PLX and they are great. Easier to transport at 21 pounds each, than my original QSC MX-3000a at 69 pounds. I've also owned the RMX and sold it only because it was underpowered at 850 watts. It was impressively constructed and very durable.

I'm Jonesing for an RMX 1850HD specifically to power subwoofers. This model is specifically designed to support heavy 2-ohm loads.

It all boils down to weight. I doubt anybody can hear the differences, especially live bassists.

 

[DaveDeVille]

made in China. I guess they have the assembly thing down pretty well.
It all boils down to weight. I doubt anybody can hear the differences, especially live bassists.

the weight issue might be a problem for some , just be careful how you lift and you should be ok . power and sound in both units are great !!

as for "assembled in China " , thats a whole other thread...
i really have no problem with the weight or assemble location ...

 

[SpiralEyes123]

just get some casters on the rack or a dolly and you will be fine with an RMX.

 

[Rumzini]

I just bought an RMX 2450 a few days ago= heavy + rack case= heavier + Hartke 4000 I'm using as a preamp+ oh boy!!! Along with Avatar 212 and 410 and Mahogony bass....geeez! Oh well...I work for FedEx and lift like this all day...so what. Anyways...I couldn't justify the extra money to get the same wattage out of a PLX to save weight. I also agree with the dolly deal...I have one its nice.

I could care less where it is assembled...as long as it works and is reliable.

Basically once I hit that first note last night with the new QSC...I quickly forgot how much it weighed and cost!