Have an old school mechanic lined up first.Any suggestions? I am admittedly not experienced.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Have an old school mechanic lined up first.Any suggestions? I am admittedly not experienced.
I got to drive a very old 2nd or 3rd generation convertible steel body Stingray a couple of times. I don't know what size V8 motor was in it but it wasn't fast. It was huge. I was surprised how truly awful was the handling. For what looks like a full on sports car I expected a lot more.Just curious, have you ever actually driven any if these early 70s muscle cars on the road? Because these cars are built on technology that's more than 50 years old.
As cool and stylish as they are, they all really do drive like crap. The suspension and brakes were terrible, the big V8s made them nose heavy, they typically ran rough and needed constant tune ups, and they weren't just uncomfortable, but horribly unsafe.
I'm not trying to talk you out of getting one. Just suggesting that it's worth considering if the appeal of owning a car like this will quickly wear off after you've experienced a summer of taking it out on a cruise every weekend or so.
Like so many others my age, I owned one or more classic muscle cars that were available on the used market during the 80's for dirt cheap. Many of us gave up on them in the decade or two following, at least in part because driving these cars on the street really kinda sucked,
You may not care about that at all and it's just part of the charm and that's cool. But I've seen people who are used to modern cars, first time driving a 1970 GT something or other with a big block, 4 wheel drum brakes, rear leaf suspension, and front bench seat just about crap their pants in horror from the experience.
Being a Mopar fan I like the idea of the Duster. Although a 73 is out of the super cool range. I owned and built a 70 H (340) code four speed Duster340. It was pretty dang quick. View attachment 3796426View attachment 3796427
A 73 GTO has a different interesting look to it but its not high on performance. As a Pontiac guy I'd go for an earlier GTO if that was your choice, 1970 and back with the best motor option you can find. A 71 or 72 may do if you can find it with a 455HO. I have a 68 Firebird 400 but I've owned a pair of 79 Trans Ams a 1965 Lemans and some later stuff. If you want to consider a newer 80's car Buick Grand Nationals are a good bet for fun and will most likely increase. A late 80's Trans Am was available with the Grand National Turbo 3.8 after the GN was discontinued. It ran faster than the GN did and would be a good choice too. You can also look for just about any 70's Trans Am they are steadily climbing. The real gems would be a 70' 1/2 TA with a Ram Air IV a 71 or 72 with the 455HO or the best of the bunch a 73 or 74 455 Super Duty. A later 77 Special Edition Trans Am (think Smokey and the Bandit) would be a good one too but won't run as hard as the earlier ones.
This is what I want. I don't need handling. I just want to cruise knowing I'm in a car I love, I have enough power to enjoy the exhaust note, and get a thrill on straight away acceleration. The sound of the engine to me is more important than the handling.
Also those seats are very comfortable to me and I very much like the lack of the middle waterfall Style divider in the car. I like letting my legs hang loose being able to hang them all the way to the side and having a lot of legroom sideways as well as straight away. In a lot of ways it's more comfortable for me then Contour bucket seats and Lumbar supports and whatever else you can come up with.
By the way, I hadn't read any posts here when I wr
I remember the 89 ish TA with the Turbo 3.8 GN engine. Iirc, only 1500 or so of them were built, so finding one may not be an easy task.
What??? My C-7 Vette goes 0 to 60 in 3.8 seconds. And this is we me driving and I am not a pro. 484 HP delivered to the rear wheels. If that is not a little muscle, I don't know what is.Camaros/Firebirds (F-bodies) and Mustangs (pony cars) aren't muscle cars by definition. Neither are Corvettes.
I'm assuming the Corvette would be classified as a Sports Car.What??? My C-7 Vette goes 0 to 60 in 3.8 seconds. And this is we me driving I am not a pro. 484 HP delivered to the rear wheels. If that is not a little muscle, I don't know what is.
View attachment 3796990
What??? My C-7 Vette goes 0 to 60 in 3.8 seconds. And this is we me driving and I am not a pro. 484 HP delivered to the rear wheels. If that is not a little muscle, I don't know what is.
View attachment 3796990
Steel body? Stingray?I got to drive a very old 2nd or 3rd generation convertible steel body Stingray a couple of times. I don't know what size V8 motor was in it but it wasn't fast. It was huge. I was surprised how truly awful was the handling. For what looks like a full on sports car I expected a lot more.
I followed a late 60's wagon with the nice paint and flash wheels over a bit of a hill climb a few years ago. Must of had some suspension improvement as it handled well going up, slightly lowered and plenty of power. Obviously the driver was giving it some and it was only slowing me up a little so kinda fun to watch. Going down it was hopeless. Disc brake conversion needed!
Steel body? Stingray?
apart from your last paragraph, you would be able to get the same from a 2000s on car.
Pontiac GTO, Camaro, Mustang, Challenger or as you suggested - a Corvette. Airbags and air conditioning in these.
I have the feeling you are not after a 4door sedan so I excluded the Pontiac G8 & Chev SS.
I got to drive a very old 2nd or 3rd generation convertible steel body Stingray a couple of times. I don't know what size V8 motor was in it but it wasn't fast. It was huge. I was surprised how truly awful was the handling. For what looks like a full on sports car I expected a lot more.
Somehow I don't see the newer stuff having the same visual appeal as the old stuff. Yeah, a 2019 Camaro can run circles around a 69, but 20 years from now no one is going to crowd around the 2019 and look at it in awe..... it's just another plastic bumpered car that looks like every other car on the road today...... Imo, if course.
There's something about the styling, brute force and ignorance of a 50 year old hot rod that will never fade away......
What's the competing one of the time? Open top roadster boat.Don't remember any Corvette being offered with a steel body.......
Fishheadjoe, I think you mean Buick Grand National. And there were no four doors in that modelMy brother had a 70 Chevelle SS in the 80's. Stupid fast car, heavy as all h e double hockey sticks.
Towed it from Canada to a shop in Georgia to have the engine re-built. Compression was so high as a result, he was looking at aviation fuel to run it!
Did I mention stupid fast?
After getting married and a baby on the way, it was time to sell. He replaced the Chevelle with a Pontiac Grand National, family car as it had four doors! That thing was faster than the Chevelle!
If it were me, I would look for a Grand National. Turbo 6 cylinder, check it out.
Fishheadjoe
Fishheadjoe, I think you mean Buick Grand National. And there were no four doors in that model